SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1299

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, BENCH AT JAIPUR
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, PRAVEER BHATNAGAR, JJ.
Krishna Kumar, S/o. Shri Bhera Ram - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical Education, Government Secretariat and Ors. - Respondents
D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.689 Of 2022 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4713 Of 2022
Decided On : 29-09-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Manish Parihar & Mr. Ashutosh Charan, Adv. for Mr. Tanveer Ahmed.
For the Respondents: Dr. V.B. Sharma, assisted by Mr. Prakhar Gupta, Mr. Ankit Rathore & Mr. Harshal Tholia, Mr. Angad Mirdha.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the requirement of studying 'Biology' for two years at the Senior Secondary Level is mandatory for eligibility for MBBS admission, based on the eligibility criteria provided in the Regulations and the information bulletin.

Headnote:

Eligibility Criteria - MBBS Admission - NEET UG 2021 - [Higher/Senior Secondary Examination or the Indian School Certificate Examination after a period of 12 years study, the last two years of such study comprising of Physics, Chemistry, Biology/Bio-technology and Mathematics or any other elective subject with English at a level not less than the core course for English as prescribed by the National Council of Educational Research and Training] - The court affirmed that the appellant was not eligible for MBBS admission as he had studied 'Biology' as a subject in 12th Class only and not in 11th Class. The court analyzed various decisions and held that the requirement of studying 'Biology' for two years at the Senior Secondary Level was mandatory and not arbitrary, based on the eligibility criteria provided in the Regulations and the information bulletin. The court emphasized the importance of the last two years of study comprising Biology and rejected the appellant's claim of eligibility based on various decisions and judgments.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant sought admission to the MBBS course in Government Medical College, Kota after being allotted the college in the second round of counseling. However, the college denied admission based on the appellant's eligibility, as he had studied 'Biology' as a subject in 12th Class only and not in 11th Class. The appellant filed a writ petition claiming eligibility based on his academic record and various judicial decisions.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellant was not eligible for MBBS admission as per the eligibility criteria provided in the Regulations and the information bulletin. The court affirmed the Ld. Single Judge's decision and dismissed the appeal.

Issues: The main issue was the eligibility of the appellant for MBBS admission based on the requirement of studying 'Biology' for two years at the Senior Secondary Level.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the requirement of studying 'Biology' for two years at the Senior Secondary Level was mandatory and not arbitrary, based on the eligibility criteria provided in the Regulations and the information bulletin. The court emphasized the importance of the last two years of study comprising Biology and rejected the appellant's claim of eligibility based on various decisions and judgments.

Final Decision: The court affirmed the Ld. Single Judge's decision and dismissed the appeal.

ORDER :

1. This appeal is directed against order dated 18.05.2022 passed by Ld. Single Judge whereby the appellant’s petition seeking a direction to allow him to join the MBBS course in Government Medical College, Kota in pursuance of allotment letter and second round of counseling, has been dismissed.

2. Quint-essential facts necessary for adjudication of controversy involved in the present appeal are that the appellant participated in National Entrance-cum-Eligibility Test, U.G. 2021 (hereinafter read as “NEET UG 2021”) and secured 637 marks. Appellant secured All India Rank at Sr. No.6610. Thereafter, the appellant was permitted to appear in the counseling process for admission and in the first round of counseling, he was allotted Government Medical College, Pali where he submitted all his certificates, documents & credentials. As pleaded in the petition, in the second round of counseling, the appellant was allotted Government Medical College, Kota, by way of up-gradation whereafter he deposited the requisite fee in the Government Medical College, Kota.

3. However, the Principal, Government Medical College, Kota did not allow him to join. Vide his letter dated 14.03.2022 addressed to the Chairman, NEET U.G. State Counseling Board, Principal sought appropriate direction and guidance regarding appellant-writ petitioner’s eligibility by highlighting that the appellant had studied 'Biology' in 12th Class alone and therefore, as per the eligibility criteria stated in the information booklet, he was not eligible for admission. A reminder was sent to him on 15.03.2022 again highlighting that 'Biology' subject was not listed as a subject in the mark-sheet of Class 11th whereas the eligibility criteria required study for two years in the subject of 'Biology'. As the appellant was denied admission, he approached this Court by filing writ petition on the ground that the appellant-writ petitioner had a brilliant academic record and he passed Class 11th examination with core subjects of Physics, Chemistry and in the electives he had studied and passed in the subjects of Mathematics and Hindi. In the Senior Secondary Examination, 2020, the appellant-writ petitioner had opted Hindi and English as compulsory subjects whereas he had taken Physics, Chemistry and Biology as optional subject and as an additional he had also taken Mathematics. He passed in Senior Secondary Examination. On such factual assertion, the appellant-writ petitioner claimed that since he had studied 'Biology' as an optional subject in 12th Class, he was entitled to be declared eligible even if he had not taken ‘Biology’ as a compulsory or optional subject in 11th Class.

4. The relief sought in the writ petition was opposed by the respondents mainly on the ground that the eligibility criteria clearly stated that in order to be eligible, a candidate must have studied 'Biology' in both 11th and 12th Class. The appellant-writ petitioner having taken 'Biology' as subject only in Class 12th and not in Class 11th, he was not eligible.

5. Ld. Single Judge by impugned order held that among other requirements, last two years of study at the Senior Secondary Level requires study in the subject of 'Biology' and as the appellant-writ petitioner had studied and passed in 'Biology' only in 12th class, he was not eligible.

6. Aggrieved by the said order, this appeal has been preferred.

7. Learned counsel for the appellant-writ petitioner contended before us that eligibility criteria as prescribed in the information booklet was under judicial scrutiny in various decisions. In the case of Tanishq Gangwar & Others Versus Union of India & Others, W.P. (C) 6773/2018, the regulations insofar as it required 'Biology' as compulsory subject through regular course to study was declared arbitrary and unconstitutional by Delhi High Court and therefore, the advertisement clearly provided that the candidates, who have passed 10+2 level with 'Biology' as additional subject will also be eligible for MBBS e

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top