ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Hanuman Ram (Deceased) S/o Shri Kishana Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court contained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, instant petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:
2. Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner.
3. Cost of the writ petition may be awarded in favour of the petitioner.”
Submissions by the petitioner:
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without following the provisions and without conducting any enquiry under Rule 16/17 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (for short ‘the Rules of 1958’) the petitioner has been removed from service. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for an alleged incident which occurred on 04.
Basudeo Tiwari vs. Sido Kanhu University and Ors. reported in 1998 (8) SCC 194
Director General of Police and Ors. v. G. Dasayan (1998) 2 SCC 407
Jaswant Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Ors reported in 1991(1) SCC 362.
Reena Rani Vs. State of Haryana reported in 2012 (10) SCC 215
Rajendra Yadav Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors. reported in (2013) 3 SCC 73
Sudesh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and ors. reported in (2005) 11 SCC 525
Union of India and Anr. vs. Tulsiram Patel reported in 1985 (3) SCC 398.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.