IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
Lila Kumari Meena D/o Shri Rodaji Meena – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Primary Education and ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15497, 16324, 16205, 16210, 16340, 16598, 17181 of 2023
Decided On : 07-11-2023
ST-TSP - Teacher Recruitment - Advertisement 16.12.2022 - Clause 6 - 36% minimum passing mark for ST-TSP category - Court directs respondents to treat petitioners as qualified under ST-TSP category with 36% marks
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, belonging to ST-TSP (Divorcee / Widow) category, participated in the Rajasthan Eligibility Examination of Teachers Level I & II (REET-2022). The bone of contention arose from the minimum passing marks for different categories in the advertisement dated 16.12.2022.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners, despite falling under the widow/divorcee category, should be treated as qualified under the ST-TSP category with 36% marks, as per the advertisement.
Issues: The main issue was the eligibility criteria for the petitioners, who belonged to the ST-TSP category but were being disqualified based on the widow/divorcee category's minimum passing marks.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioners, as ST-TSP category candidates, should be entitled to the relaxation of 36% minimum marks, and the category providing optimum benefit lawfully had to be applied.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitions and directed the respondents to treat the petitioners as qualified under the ST-TSP category with 36% marks, granting them appropriate appointment within three months.
ORDER :
1. Since all the instant petitions involve a common controversy, though with marginal variation in the contextual facts, therefore, for the purposes of the present analogous adjudication, the facts and the prayer clauses are being taken from the above-numbered S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15497/2023, while treating the same as a lead case, rival submissions of the parties and the observations of the Court, in the present order, would also be based, particularly, on the factual matrix of the lead case.
1.1 The prayer clauses read as under :-
ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to issue afresh selection list while selecting remaining 05 candidates belongs to ST-TSP (Divorcee) Category.
iii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to offered appointment to the petitioner on the post of Teacher Level 1st (General Education) in pursuant to advertisement bearing no.12/2022 dated 16.12.2022 (Annexure-03) with all consequential benefits.
iv). Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court considers just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.
IV. Costs of the wit petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioners."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are belonging to ST-TSP (Divorcee / Widow) category. The petitioners have participated in the Rajasthan Eligibility Examination of Teachers Level I & II (hereinafter to be referred as 'REET-2022').
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court towards the Clause 6 of the advertisement dated 12.04.2022, which relates to minimum passing mark for REET2022 and sub-Clause-II of the Government circular dated 29.08.2012 for the scheduled area, which stipulates 36% minimum passing mark for such candidates belonging to scheduled tribe. When the recruitment process started for Teacher Grade-III Level I & II (General and Special Education) in TSP area, an advertisement was issued on 16.12.2022 and the bone of contention has arisen out of the following clause in the advertisement dated 16.12.2022 :-
jkT; ljdkj ds vkns'k i=kad%& ia- 7¼13½ izkf'k@vk;ks@2019 t;iqj] fnukad 16- 12-2020 ds vuqlkj jktLFkku izkkFkfed fo|ky; v/;kid lkekU;@fo'ks"k f'k{kk ¼ysoy izFke] d{kk 1 ls 5 rd½ lh/kh HkrhZ&2022 ds lEcfU/kr oxZokj inksa gsrq eq[; ijh{kk esa 'kkfey gksus ds fy, vH;FkhZ dks jktLFkku v/;kid ik=rk ijh{kk&2021 vFkok jktLFkku v/;kid ik=rk ijh{kk&2022 ds ysoy&izFke esa fuEukuqlkj U;wure izkIrkad izfr'kr vftZr djuk vfuok;Z gksxk%&
| Øla- | Js.kh | U;wure mÙkhZ.kkad izfr'kr | |
| Non TSP | TSP | ||
| 1- | lkekU;@vukjf{kr | 60 | 60 |
| 2- | vuqlwfpr tutkfr (ST) | 55 | 36 |
| 3- | vuqlwfpr tkfr (SC), vU; fiNM+k oxZ (OBC)] vfr fiNM+k oxZ (MBC) rFkk vkfFkZd :i ls detksj oxZ (EWS) | 55 | |
| 4- | LeLr Js.kh dh fo/kok ,oa ifjR;Drk efgyk,a rFkk HkwriwoZ lSfud | 50 | |
| 5- | fnO;kax ¼fu%'kDrtu½ Js.kh esa fu;ekuqlkj vkus okys leLr O;fDr | 40 | |
| 6- | lgfj;k tutkfr ds O;fDr | 36 ¼lgfj;k {ks=½ | |
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ST -TSP category, the qualifying marks were 36% whereas for all the categories of widow, divorcee and ex-servicemen, a general rule of 50% minimum qualifying marks has been stipulated.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioners cannot be deprived of the relaxation of 36% minimum marks in the REET-2022, which is already available to the petitioners, who are ST -TSP category, although the next classification in the advertisement brings t
The court established that NCTE guidelines for teacher eligibility take precedence over state recruitment criteria, ensuring candidates are evaluated based on merit and eligibility.
The NCTE notification dated 29.07.2011 provided relaxation in qualifying marks only to candidates belonging to reserved categories, and the absence of reservation for OBC category in the TSP Area rec....
Eligibility criteria for reserved category candidates must be consistently applied across government agencies, allowing for rounding off of marks in qualifying examinations.
The court emphasized the importance of vacancies and the validity of merit lists in determining the eligibility of candidates for appointment.
Passing the TET examination is a necessary qualification for appointment as a teacher, and denial based on marks below 60% for unreserved category is not legally valid.
Eligibility criteria must be fulfilled by the last date for receipt of applications specified in the advertisement, and no relaxation is permissible for diverting from the terms and conditions of the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.