SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1340

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, BENCH AT JAIPUR
GANESH RAM MEENA, J.
Sonika Singh, Daughter Of Virendra Pratap Singh – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) and Anr. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21997 Of 2018
Decided On : 01-12-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Bharat Yadav.
For the Respondents: Mr. M.S. Singhvi with Mr. Siddhant Jain.

Eligibility criteria must be fulfilled by the last date for receipt of applications specified in the advertisement, and no relaxation is permissible for diverting from the terms and conditions of the advertisement.

Headnote:

DIVORCEE - Recruitment to the post of Teacher Gr.III Level 2 - Rajasthan Eligibility Exam for Teachers (REET) 2017 - Hindu Marriage Act - 13B - (2020) 17 SCC 401, Piyush Kaviya & Ors. Vs. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Ors. (DB Spl. Appl. Writ No.198/2018 & Other connected special appeals) - 28.06.2023 advertisement - 31.07.2023 - 20.10.2023 - 31.07.2023 - 20.10.2023 - 28.06.2023 - 31.07.2023

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, who passed the Rajasthan Eligibility Exam for Teachers (REET) 2017, applied for recruitment to the post of Teacher Gr.III Level 2 under advertisement No.5/18. She mentioned her marital status as 'married' in the application form submitted on 19.8.2018, but obtained a divorce decree on 11.9.2018. She sought consideration under the divorcee category, which was denied by the respondents.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's divorce decree was obtained after the last date for submitting the application form, and the eligibility for a category is determined based on the candidate's qualifications on the last date of form submission. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the terms and conditions of the advertisement and the rules, and dismissed the petition as the petitioner failed to establish her case within the rights given under the Constitution of India.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner's candidature could be considered under the divorcee category despite obtaining the divorce decree after the last date for submitting the application form.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that eligibility criteria must be fulfilled by the last date for receipt of applications specified in the advertisement, and no relaxation is permissible for diverting from the terms and conditions of the advertisement. The completion of the recruitment process smoothly is essential, and candidates must apply according to their qualifications as required under the law and the eligible category.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner's claim for consideration of her candidature under the divorcee decree was contrary to the rules, terms and conditions of the advertisement, and she could not establish her case within the rights given under the Constitution of India.

ORDER :

1. The factual matrix of the case is that the petitioner passed the Rajasthan Eligibility Exam for Teachers (REET) 2017 and she being qualified for recruitment to the post of Teacher Gr.III Level 2 applied for recruitment under the Advertisement No.5/18 issued by the respondents on 31.07.2018. The last date of submitting the application form was 25.08.2018 and the petitioner submitted her application form No. 201807400712 on 19.8.2018 with the mention of her marital status as ‘married’.

It is also a fact on record that a decree of divorce was passed on 11.9.2018 by the Court of learned Addl. District Judge, Chhabra, District Baran (Rajasthan) on the joint application filed by the petitioner and her husband under section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act.

2. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has applied for recruitment to the post of Teacher Gr.III Level 2 pursuant to advertisement No.5/2018 under the General Woman Category but since divorce decree has been passed on the mutual consent and joint application on 11.9.2018, her candidature should have been considered by the respondents against the vacancies reserved for divorcee category. He further submits that non-consideration of the candidature of the petitioner under the divorcee category, be declared illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and the respondents be directed to allow the petitioner against the vacancies reserved for divorcee category on the post of Teacher Gr.III Level 2.

3. Shri M.S. Singhvi, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. Siddhant Jain, submits that the eligibility of a candidate for a particular post on the basis of his/her educational qualifications and the other requirements and so also his /her candidature under a particular category, is considered on the basis of the requisite documents possessed by that candidate on the last date of submission of the application form if no other date has been given in the advertisement or in the rules. He further submits that the petitioner filled up the application form for recruitment on the post of Teacher Gr.III Level 2 mentioning her marital status as ‘married’ and on the last date of submitting the application form she was not having a decree of divorce. So also in view of the terms and conditions of the advertisement, no candidate can be allowed to change his/ her category after the last date of submitting the application form or the date upto which the candidates are allowed to make amendments in their application forms. He also submits that the last date for submitting the application from in the present case was 25.08.2018 and on the last date the petitioner was not having the decree of divorce from the Competent Court. Therefore, her candidature in divorcee category in any no manner could be considered.

In support of his submissions Shri M.S. Singhvi, learned Advocate General has placed reliance upon the following judgments:-

    1. Hirandra Kumar Vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad & Anr., reported in (2020) 17 SCC 401; and

(2) Piyush Kaviya & Ors. Vs. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Ors. (DB Spl. Appl. Writ No.198/2018 & Other connected special appeals) decided on 10.04.2018 by the Division Bench of the Principal Seat at Jodhpur.

4. Considered the submissions made by the counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Advocate General Shri M.S. Singhvi and also perused the material made available on record with the petition.

5. The admitted facts on record are that the advertisement No.5/2018 for recruitment on the post of Teacher Gr.III Level 2 was issued on 31.07.2018 and the last date for submitting the application form was fixed as 25.8.2018 and further the divorce decree was passed on the joint application of the petitioner and her husband on 11.9.2018 by the Court of learned Addl. District Judge, Chhabra, District Baran (Rajasthan) i.e. after the last date of submitting the application form.

6. It is a well settled law that the el

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      Judicial Analysis

      AI

      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top