SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 824

DEEPAK ROSHAN
Mamta Rani, wife of Sri Abhijit Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Khalida Haya Rashmi, Adv
For the Respondents: Ms. Darshana Poddar, AAG-1

JUDGMENT :

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that though she had qualified in the Teachers Eligibility Test (in short TET) examination but she has not been given appointment for the post of Assistant Teacher in spite of the fact that her marks were more than the last selected candidate.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of this Court towards the advertisement which was published in the year 2015 for the post of appointment of Teachers and submits that by going through the advertisement it would transpire that that the qualification for being appointed as Teacher, the candidates must have passed TET. However, though the petitioner is having more merit points than the last selected candidate but the appointment has been denied to her.

4. Learned counsel further draws attention of this Court towards the counter affidavit wherein stand has been taken by the respondents that as per Jharkhand Primary School Teachers’ Appointment Rules, 2012 (hereinafter to be referred as Appointment Rules); the petitioner had to secure 60% marks in TET examination for appointment on the post of Trained Graduate Assistant Teacher; as PH category a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top