IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J.
Phoolmati W/o Shri Avdhesh - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan through Principal Health Secretary and ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8155 of 2016
Decided On : 20-02-2024
Right to Health - Violation of Right to Health and Welfare Schemes - Janani Suraksha Yojna (JSY), Pradhan Mantari Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan (PMSMA), Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakaram (JSSK) - Summary of Acts and Sections
Fact of the Case:
A pregnant petitioner was denied timely medical attention and forced to deliver twins on the road due to the negligent behavior of officials at a Community Health Centre. The twins died due to lack of medical attention, and the petitioner sought redressal through a writ petition invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Finding of the Court:
The court found a gross violation of the petitioner's right to health and welfare, and highlighted the failure of the government to effectively implement welfare schemes meant to reduce infant and maternal mortality. The court also emphasized the obligation of the state to preserve life and health, and the failure of the respondents to provide timely medical treatment.
Issues: Violation of right to health and welfare schemes, failure to provide timely medical treatment, and negligence of officials at the Community Health Centre.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the right to health is an integral facet of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution, and emphasized the obligation of the state to ensure the preservation of the right to life and health. The court also highlighted the need for effective implementation of welfare schemes and the joint liability of the Union of India and the State Government.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to compensate the petitioner with Rs. 4 Lakhs, increase cash benefits under welfare schemes, conduct departmental inquiries, and take corrective measures for effective implementation of the schemes. The court also directed the formation of a Joint High Powered Committee and awarded a cost of Rs. 25,000 to the petitioner.
ORDER :
Sarve Santu Niramayah
Sarve Bhadrani Pashayantu
Maa Kaschiddukhbhag Bharete”
It is believed worldwide that the above verse belongs to Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. The above Shaloka means:-
May all be free from infirmities and illness.
May all see good,
May no one suffer in any way.
But the above verse of Upanishad has been grossly violated in this case. The instant case is a classic example of death of humanity on the part of the erring officials of the respondents.
1. A heart breaking, nerve cracking, conscious shocking and society rocking, tragic, pathetic incident occurred when the welfare State and the Union of India failed to discharge their duties and the petitioner was forced to deliver twin children in the middle of the road in the market on 07.04.2016 and due to reckless and negligent behaviour of the officials of the staff posted at the Community Health Centre (for short “the CHC”) at Khedli, District Alwar, the newly born twin children lost their life in absence of required urgent medical attention. This incident shows death of humanity.
2. On the fateful day i.e. on 07.04.2016, the petitioner suffered labour pain and she was taken to the CHC, Khedli. The staff posted there asked her about the ‘MAMTA Card’ for providing treatment to her but in absence of the same, the treatment was not provided to her. Only certain medicines were prescribed on a paper and that too was not provided to her at the CHC. Under these compelling circumstances, husband of the petitioner brought the medicines from the shop situated outside the CHC. In the meantime, labour pain of the petitioner was increased and no one provided her the required medical attention, hence, the petitioner had to leave the premises of the CHC. In absence of any transport facility, the pregnant petitioner had to walk towards bus stop and while crossing the road, the pain of the petitioner became unbearable & intolerable and she delivered twin children in the middle of the road in the market at around 11:30 AM. Upon seeing the heart breaking incident, the women present nearby gathered there and covered the whole tragic scene by sarees, dupattas and bed-sheets. Immediately, thereafter the petitioner and her newly born twin children were taken to the CHC, Khedli but looking to their critical condition, they were referred to the higher centre i.e. Mahila Zanana Hospital, Bharatpur. One child died on the way to the hospital and another child was admitted to the hospital but a huge amount of money was demanded from the family members of the petitioner, which they could not be able to arrange and around 11:00 PM the second child of the petitioner also died for want of medical attention and required treatment.
3. In spite of having several schemes like Janani Suraksha Yojna (JSY), Pradhan Mantari Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan (PMSMA) and Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakaram (JSSK), etc., the petitioner did not get free treatment, medicines and unfortunately she lost her newly born twin children due to grave negligent act of the respondents. Hence, under these circumstances, the petitioner has been compelled to knock the doors of this Court by way of filing this writ petition, invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court, contained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with the following prayer:-
1. By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof directing the Respondents to ensure effective implementation of the Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakaram (JSSK) and Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) as also ensure safe institutional deliveries because due to untimely medical attention petitioner had to deliver her twins on ro
C.E.S.C. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Subhash Chandra Bose & Ors.
Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. UOI & Ors.
The judgment establishes the obligation of the state to preserve the right to life and health, and emphasizes the need for effective implementation of welfare schemes to reduce infant and maternal mo....
The right to health is integral to the right to life under Article 21, necessitating timely and adequate medical care, which was grossly violated in the case of the deceased, leading to her avoidable....
Absence of doctor in government Primary Health Centre during labour, coupled with nurses leaving patient unattended before delayed referral, constitutes institutional negligence violating right to li....
State hospitals must provide timely medical treatment; failure constitutes a breach of the right to life under Article 21.
The State is obligated to provide adequate medical facilities, and negligence in this regard, particularly during childbirth, can lead to liability for resulting harm or death, as demonstrated in thi....
The main legal principle established is the interpretation of the Scheme to provide financial assistance to health workers who lost their lives on account of Covid-19 related duties, widening the def....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.