IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
GANESH RAM MEENA, J.
Mukesh Kumar Saini, S/o. Govind Ram - Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12678 of 2021
Decided On : 02-04-2024
Eligibility - Teacher Recruitment - Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 - The court interpreted the eligibility criteria for teacher recruitment, emphasizing the necessity to consider all relevant qualifications submitted by candidates, leading to the conclusion that the petitioner was entitled to appointment based on his qualifications.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, having completed multiple degrees including B.A., B.Ed., and B.Sc. Math, applied for a Teacher Grade-III position but was not considered due to the exclusion of his second graduation marks in the merit list preparation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondents failed to consider the petitioner's qualifications as required by the rules, and that he was eligible for appointment based on his educational qualifications.
Issues: Whether the respondents were obligated to consider the petitioner's second graduation marks while preparing the merit list for Teacher Grade-III recruitment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that all qualifications submitted by the petitioner prior to the application deadline must be considered in the merit list preparation, as per the relevant rules and previous court decisions.
Result: The writ petition is allowed, directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Teacher Grade-III Level-II Math-Science.
JUDGMENT :
Ganesh Ram Meena, J.
1. The matter comes up on an application (IA No. 2/2024) filed by the petitioner for taking on record the additional documents i.e. the order dated 21.01.2022 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat Jodhpur, in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6438/2019, Kailash Damor Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
2. Learned counsels appearing for the parties agreed to hear the matter on its merits at this stage and therefore, the matter is now being heard and decided finally.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner completed the Graduation in Arts subject (B.A.) in the year, 2011 and thereafter, B.Ed in the year, 2013 and also completed B.Sc. Math (P.C.M.) from OPJS University during Session 2013-16. He has also passed the Rajasthan Eligibility Examination for Teachers (for short ‘the REET examination’) for the year, 2015 with 75.33% in Level 2 and has been issued the Certificate by the Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan Ajmer certifying that the petitioner is eligible for the post of Teacher in English language.
4. The respondents issued an Advertisement dated 11.09.2017 (01/2017) for inviting applications for the post of Teacher Grade-III Level-2 (Non TSP) and the last date for submitting the application forms was 30.12.2017 and in pursuance to the said Advertisement, the petitioner submitted his application form on 15.12.2017 itself.
5. Dr. Gunjan Sharma learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner belongs to OBC (NCL) Male category and he has secured 75.33 % in the REET examination. She further submits that in view of the formula prescribed by the respondents for preparing the merit list given under the advertisement, the petitioner secured 73.25 marks and Merit No. WL-1153 and the cut-off marks for the OBC (NCL) Male category is 71.96, meaning thereby the petitioner is having higher marks than the cut-off marks for the particular category even then he is not given the appointment because the respondents while preparing the merit list has not considered the marks obtained by the petitioner in qualifying examination i.e. Second Graduation with Math. He further submits that the action of the respondents is illegal and arbitrary, as he is entitled for appointment on the basis of marks obtained by him in the Second Graduation i.e. in Math (PCM) which was completed prior to the last date of submitting application forms.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon the order dated 20.02.2024 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in the case of Kailash Damor (supra) & Sanjay Ashiya Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21592/2018.
7. Mr. Vigyan Shah, learned AAG assisted by Mr. Yash Joshi, Advocate appearing for the respondents State submits that the Primary Education Department conducts direct recruitment for the post of Teacher Grade-III according to the provisions of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 (for short ‘the Rules of 1996’). According to Rule 277 (A) of the Rules of 1996, the department prepares the State level merit list on the basis of information submitted by the candidates in the application forms. In reply to the memo of writ petition, it has also been stated that the petitioner has completed the Graduation in Science (B.Sc) after that he completed the B.Ed in the year, 2015.
8. The main arguments of the counsel appearing for the State is that since the petitioner has qualified the B.Ed after completion of Graduation in Science and the same was taken into consideration at the time of preparing the merit list. He further submits that the marks obtained by the petitioner in the Graduation after the B.Ed course have not been taken into consideration.
Counsel for the State is not in a position to dispute the fact that in a case having similar facts i.e. the case of Kailash Damor (supra), the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur has passed the order
Appointment on post of Teacher – It will be improper to discriminate inter se among a homogenous group of students.
A recruitment agency must consider a candidate's eligibility based solely on the information submitted at the time of application and cannot accept qualifications disclosed after the recruitment proc....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the qualifications required for appointment as a trained Teacher in Secondary School do not necessarily mandate a specific graduation subject,....
Point of law: The word “equivalent” must be given a reasonable meaning. By using the expression “equivalent” one means that there are some degrees of flexibility of adjustment which do not lower the ....
Regularized teachers cannot claim automatic placement in higher cadre like Teacher Grade-II without proving graduation from UGC-recognized university; prior regularization does not confer vested righ....
Point of law: Merely, because another view or a better view is possible, there should be no interference with or disturbance of the order passed by the Single Judge, unless both sides agree for a fai....
Eligibility criteria for reserved category candidates must be consistently applied across government agencies, allowing for rounding off of marks in qualifying examinations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.