Back
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Dilip Sharma, S/o. (Late) Shri Hanuman Prasad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through P. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J.
1. Since all these bail applications are arising out of different FIRs involving the same facts and questions of law, hence with the consent of counsel for the parties, all these bail applications are taken up together and are being decided by this common order.
2. Counsel submits that for the same cause and similar nature of allegation, four different FIRs were registered against the petitioner wherein allegation has been levelled against the petitioner that he has concocted and forged certain pattas which were never issued by the Ajmer Development Authority (for short, ‘ADA’). Counsel submits that the petitioner was arrested in the FIR No. 169/2021 registered with Police Station Ganj Ajmer on 24.05.2021 wherein he remained at Police Station for a period of one week and thereafter, he was granted bail on 11.03.2022. Counsel submits that the petitioner was very much available with the Investigating Agency at the time of his arrest in the said case. Counsel submits that prior to arrest of the petitioner by the orders of the Superintendent of Police, investigation of all the four FIRs was clubbed but even then the petitioner was not arrested in the other th
The court established that anticipatory bail requires careful consideration of the seriousness of allegations and the potential for witness tampering.
The legal position on renewal of prayer for pre-arrest bail cannot preclude an accused only on the ground of dismissal of the first bail application on merit. The court must consider substantial chan....
Anticipatory bail denied due to serious allegations of fraud, necessity for custodial interrogation, and applicants' absconding status.
The court emphasized the need for fair and impartial investigation to strengthen the judicial process and highlighted the complementary roles of the police in investigation and the judiciary in trial....
The court emphasized the need for custodial interrogation based on prima facie evidence of forgery, and highlighted the balance between personal liberty and societal interest in granting anticipatory....
The court reaffirmed that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 43D(4) of the UAPA in cases involving serious charges of terrorism, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation in s....
Bail – While deciding a bail application, Court should not embark upon a detailed enquiry with regard to merits of matter – Bail is a right of any accused and jail is an exception.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
