ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Simara Foods Pvt. Ltd, Through Its Director Praveen Satpal Jain, S/o. Shri Satpal Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anil Kumar Upman, J.
1. This misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred on behalf of the accused petitioner seeking quashing of the FIR No.239/2022 registered at Police Station Banipark, Jaipur (West) for offences under Sections 409, 420, 468, 471 and 120B IPC.
2. Brief facts in a nutshell are that the complainant-respondent No.2, submitted a complaint under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. before the Metropolitan Magistrate No.7, Jaipur Metro-II alleging inter alia that the petitioner induced him into delivering material against advanced payment by raising proforma invoices. It is alleged in the complaint that he paid advance amount but neither the petitioner supplied the material nor returned the advance amount to him. The complainant also alleged in the complaint that the petitioner made fraudulent entries in the books of accounts and usurped his money. The learned trial court sent the matter to the Police Station Banipark Jaipur for investigation whereupon the impugned FIR No.239/2022 came to be registered against the accused petitioner for offences under Sections 409, 420, 468, 471 and 120B IPC.
3. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner contends that the imp
Dalip Kaur & Ors. Vs. Jagnar Singh & Anr.
Govind Prasad Kejriwal Vs. State of Bihar & Anr.
Mohd. Ibrahim & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Anr.
Google India Private Ltd. v. Visakha Industries & Ors.
Lakshman v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
Sanapareday Maheedhar Seshagiri v. State of Andra Pradesh
R. Kalyani v. Janak C. Mehta and Ors.
Harmanpreet Singh Ahluwalia and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.