RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
Rameshwar Vyas, J.
Neha Singh - Appellant
Versus
Sunil Kumar - Respondent
Civil Transfer Application No. 9 of 2021
Decided On : 06-08-2021
Transfer - Divorce Petition - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - The court discussed the provisions of Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, emphasizing the balance of convenience and the applicant's difficulties in attending court proceedings.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant-wife sought to transfer a divorce petition from Sikar to Ajmer due to difficulties in traveling and alleged harassment from her in-laws, while the husband opposed the transfer, claiming the applicant was not acting in good faith.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant faced significant inconvenience and potential harassment attending court in Sikar, while the husband could easily attend proceedings in Ajmer, thus favoring the transfer.
Issues: Whether the transfer of the divorce petition from Sikar to Ajmer should be granted based on the applicant's circumstances and the balance of convenience.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant's health issues and the potential for harassment justified the transfer, emphasizing the importance of convenience in legal proceedings.
Result: The transfer petition was allowed, moving the divorce case from Family Court, Sikar to Family Court, Ajmer.
JUDGMENT
Rameshwar Vyas, J. - The instant transfer application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred by the applicant-wife seeking transfer of the divorce petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (afterwards referred to as the Act of 1955 ) for dissolution of marriage bearing CIS No. 138/2020 titled as Sunil Kumar Vs. Neha Singh from Family Court, Sikar to Family Court, Ajmer.
2. As per averments made in the application, the marriage between the applicant and the non-applicant was solemnized on 30.04.2012 at Sikar in accordance with Hindu rites; thereafter, both of them started living together as husband and wife at Sikar. The applicant came to be appointed on the post of Assistant Manager Scale I in Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank in the year 2016 and remained posted at Sikar upto October, 2020. The applicant resided with her in-laws at Sikar in her matrimonial home while she was posted at Sikar. Presently, she is working on the post of Manager Scale II in the Head Office of Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank at Ajmer and is residing there. The non-applicant and his parent started taunting at the applicant for extraneous reasons without any fault on her part. When the family situation at her matrimonial home became unbearable, applicant having no option submitted an application before the higher authorities of the Bank seeking her transfer from Sikar to Ajmer in the month of July, 2020. The applicant sought transfer under the belief that after her transfer from Sikar, the family situation will get normalized. The non-applicant after resigning from Modi Institute, Laxmangarh in the year 2017, has joined the multinational company at Jaipur. In the month of July, 2020, when the applicant sought transfer from Sikar to Ajmer, the nonapplicant with malafide intention filed the divorce petition under Section 13(1)(i-a)(i-b) of the Act of 1955 seeking dissolution of marriage before the Family Court, Sikar on the basis of false allegations on 28.07.2020. The father of the applicant is a retired employee of National Textile Corporation, a Public Sector Undertaking. In such circumstances, it is very difficult for the applicant to travel from Ajmer to Sikar to attend the family court proceedings as she has to take leave on each date of hearing. The applicant is suffering from back ache and has been advised to avoid jerks and travelling and therefore, it is very difficult and strenuous for the applicant to travel from Ajmer to Sikar from time to time for attending the court proceedings. Besides, the applicant has reasonable apprehension that her in-laws and husband can threaten and pressurize her while attending the court proceedings at Sikar. The non-applicant is serving at Jaipur and if the divorce petition filed by him is transferred to Family Court, Ajmer then, there will not be any harassment to him. The balance of convenience lies in favour of the applicant. On the above grounds, the present transfer petition has been filed by the applicant.
3. In reply, it is submitted that the applicant has not come before this Court with clean hands. She at her own will sought transfer from Sikar to Ajmer. While denying the allegations levelled against the non-applicant, it is submitted that the prescription slips are of suggestive nature to avoid excessive travelling. The prescription slips submitted by the applicant are fabricated documents. The applicant s family is permanent resident of Sikar City for last more than 40 years. The applicant was born in Sikar and studied in Sikar. Her grand-parents are having self built palatial house. The applicant also worked in BRKG Bank, Sikar from November, 2014 to October, 2020 without any fear from the non-applicant or his parents. It is also averred that the principle of convenience of Fora should not be left at the will of the parties. The interest of justice has to be paramount and unnecessary burden should not be put on husband to faci
The court established that the balance of convenience and the applicant's health concerns are critical in deciding transfer applications under the Code of Civil Procedure.
The court established that the convenience of the parties, especially in cases involving children and allegations of cruelty, is paramount in transfer applications.
The court established that in transfer applications, the convenience of the female litigant is paramount, especially when she has caregiving responsibilities.
In matrimonial transfer petitions, wife's convenience prevails due to distance, minor child care, financial constraints without spousal support, prioritizing balance of convenience and justice.
In matrimonial cases, convenience of the wife is the dominating factor for justifying transfer of a matter.
The court may allow the transfer of a case if the petitioner presents valid and justified grounds, and if the respondent does not rebut the averments made in the transfer application.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering the convenience of female litigants and avoiding putting them under undue hardship when deciding on the transfer o....
The main legal point established is that in transfer applications under Section 24 CPC, the court will consider the balance of convenience and the interest of justice, taking into account the parties....
The court established that the balance of convenience and the potential hardship to the petitioner justified the transfer of the case under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.