SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1255

RAMESHWAR VYAS
Rishita – Appellant
Versus
Rahul – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Praveen Karwa, Advocate, for the Appellant
Rajendra Charan, Advocate. , Advocate, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Rameshwar Vyas, J. - The instant application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of the petition filed under Section 13-1(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (afterwards referred to as "the Act of 1955"), by the respondent-husband against her bearing Divorce Petition No. 106/2021 titled as "Rahul v. Rishita" from the Family Court, Hanumangarh to Family Court, Sri Ganganagar.

2. As per averments made in application, the petitioner tied knot with the respondent at Hanumangarh as per Hindu customs on 17.04.2019. After marriage, behavior of the respondent and his family members towards petitioner was not good and polite and they harassed her for various reasons. The petitioner lodged F.I.R. No. 73/2021 at Police Station Mahila Thana, Sri Ganganagar for the offences under Sections 406, 498-A, 354, 313 & 323 of I.P.C. against the respondent and her in-laws. The petitioner has also filed application under Section 9 of the Act of 1955 against the respondent before the Family Court, Sri Ganganagar bearing Civil Misc. Application No. 326/2021. The respondent has filed divorce petition under Section 13-1(ia) o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top