SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1255

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Rameshwar Vyas, J.
Rishita – Appellant
Versus
Rahul – Respondent
S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 111/2021
Decided On : 27-06-2022

Advocates appeared:
Praveen Karwa, Advocate, for the Appellant
Rajendra Charan, Advocate. , Advocate, for the Respondents

The court may allow the transfer of a case if the petitioner presents valid and justified grounds, and if the respondent does not rebut the averments made in the transfer application.

Headnote:

Transfer of Case - Hindu Marriage Act - The court allowed the transfer of a divorce petition from one family court to another based on the petitioner's valid and justified grounds, including the inconvenience faced by the petitioner, who had filed other cases against the respondent in the court where she sought the transfer.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner-wife sought transfer of a divorce petition from one family court to another due to the inconvenience faced in attending court proceedings at the original court, as she had filed other cases against the respondent in the court where she sought the transfer.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the grounds raised by the petitioner to be valid and justified for the transfer, as the respondent did not rebut the averments made in the application.

Issues: The main issue was the transfer of the divorce petition from one family court to another based on the petitioner's grounds of inconvenience and the pendency of other cases against the respondent in the court where she sought the transfer.

Ratio Decidendi: The court allowed the transfer petition based on the valid and justified grounds raised by the petitioner, as the respondent did not rebut the averments made in the application.

Final Decision: The court allowed the transfer petition and ordered the divorce petition to be transferred to the requested family court.

JUDGMENT

Rameshwar Vyas, J. - The instant application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of the petition filed under Section 13-1(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (afterwards referred to as "the Act of 1955"), by the respondent-husband against her bearing Divorce Petition No. 106/2021 titled as "Rahul v. Rishita" from the Family Court, Hanumangarh to Family Court, Sri Ganganagar.

2. As per averments made in application, the petitioner tied knot with the respondent at Hanumangarh as per Hindu customs on 17.04.2019. After marriage, behavior of the respondent and his family members towards petitioner was not good and polite and they harassed her for various reasons. The petitioner lodged F.I.R. No. 73/2021 at Police Station Mahila Thana, Sri Ganganagar for the offences under Sections 406, 498-A, 354, 313 & 323 of I.P.C. against the respondent and her in-laws. The petitioner has also filed application under Section 9 of the Act of 1955 against the respondent before the Family Court, Sri Ganganagar bearing Civil Misc. Application No. 326/2021. The respondent has filed divorce petition under Section 13-1(ia) of the Act of 1955 against the petitioner before the Family Court, Hanumangarh. As per the petitioner, two cases between the parties are already pending at Sri Ganganagar, whereas, divorce petition filed by the respondent is pending at Hanumangarh. The petitioner being a lady is facing difficulties in attending the court proceedings at Hanumangarh. There is no male member in her family, who can accompany her while travelling from Sri Ganganagar to Hanumangarh. Therefore, she has prayed that the matter may be transferred from Hanumangarh to Sri Ganganagar. The application is supported by the affidavit of the petitioner. The copies of the litigation pending between the parties have also been placed on record.

3. Pursuant to the notice, the respondent has put in appearance but did not choose to file reply to the transfer application.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grounds raised by the petitioner in this application are valid and justified grounds for transfer of the case from Hanumangarh to Sri Ganganagar. There is no rebuttal of averments made in the application on the part of the respondent. The respondent did not choose to file reply to the transfer application.

6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that false allegations have been levelled by the petitioner against the respondent in the transfer application.

7. From the averments made in the application, it appears that the grounds raised by the petitioner are valid and justified grounds for transfer of the application. The petitioner has lodged the FIR for the offences under Sections 406, 498-A, 354, 313 & 323 of I.P.C. against the respondent and other in-laws at Police Station Mahila Thana, Sri Ganganagar. She has also filed application under Section 9 of the Act of 1955 against the respondent before the Family Court, Sri Ganganagar The petitioner is a lady. The respondent is already defending himself in the proceedings pending against him at Sri Ganganagar. In such circumstances, it would be more inconvenient for the petitioner to defend the divorce petition pending against her at Hanumangarh.

8. Having regard to the contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the grounds raised by the petitioner and the fact that the same have not been rebutted by the respondent, this Court deems it fit to allow present transfer petition.

9. Resultantly, the present transfer petition is allowed. The Divorce Petition No. 106/2021 titled as "Rahul v. Rishita" pending in the Family Court, Hanumangarh is ordered to be transferred to the Family Court, Sri Ganganagar.

10. Let the parties shall appear before the Family Court, Sri Ganganagar on 28.07.2022 and therea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top