SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2289

RAMESHWAR VYAS
Khurshida Banu – Appellant
Versus
Khurshid Khan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Surendra Bagmalani, Advocate, Tribhuwan Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rameshwar Vyas, J. - The instant transfer application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred by the applicant-wife seeking transfer of the divorce petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (afterwards referred to as "the Act of 1955"), by the non-applicant-husband bearing Divorce Petition No. 38/2021 (Reg. No. 02/2021) titled as "Khurshid Khan Vs. Khurshida Banu" from the Family Court, Jalore to Additional District Judge No. 1, Barmer.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage between applicant and non-applicant was solemnized on 09.10.2009 at Barmer in accordance with Muslim rites; out of their wedlock, two sons viz. Tofique Mohammad and Mohammad Tejib were born, who are now aged 8 and 5 years, respectively. As per the averments made in the transfer application, non-applicant- husband treated applicant-wife with cruelty, for which, the applicant has lodged an F.I.R. No. 56/2021 at Police Station Mahila Thana, Barmer for the offences under Sections 498-A, 406 & 323 I.P.C. and Sections 3 & 4 of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 against the non-applicant and his family members. She has also

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top