RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Rameshwar Vyas, J.
Khurshida Banu - Appellant
Versus
Khurshid Khan - Respondent
Civil Transfer Appl. No. 83 of 2021
Decided On : 23-10-2021
Transfer - Divorce Petition - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 24; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13 - The court emphasized the balance of convenience for the applicant-wife, considering her circumstances and the welfare of the minor children, leading to the transfer of the divorce petition.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant-wife sought to transfer a divorce petition filed by the non-applicant-husband from Jalore to Barmer, citing cruelty and the need to care for her minor children, while the non-applicant did not respond to the application.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant-wife faced significant inconvenience attending court in Jalore, especially given her responsibilities and the pending criminal case in Barmer, thus favoring the transfer.
Issues: Whether the divorce petition should be transferred from the Family Court in Jalore to the Additional District Judge in Barmer based on the applicant's circumstances and convenience.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the balance of convenience favored the applicant-wife, as her situation warranted a transfer to ensure her and her children's welfare.
Result: The transfer petition was allowed, moving the divorce case to Barmer.
JUDGMENT
Rameshwar Vyas, J. - The instant transfer application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred by the applicant-wife seeking transfer of the divorce petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (afterwards referred to as "the Act of 1955"), by the non-applicant-husband bearing Divorce Petition No. 38/2021 (Reg. No. 02/2021) titled as "Khurshid Khan Vs. Khurshida Banu" from the Family Court, Jalore to Additional District Judge No. 1, Barmer.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage between applicant and non-applicant was solemnized on 09.10.2009 at Barmer in accordance with Muslim rites; out of their wedlock, two sons viz. Tofique Mohammad and Mohammad Tejib were born, who are now aged 8 and 5 years, respectively. As per the averments made in the transfer application, non-applicant- husband treated applicant-wife with cruelty, for which, the applicant has lodged an F.I.R. No. 56/2021 at Police Station Mahila Thana, Barmer for the offences under Sections 498-A, 406 & 323 I.P.C. and Sections 3 & 4 of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 against the non-applicant and his family members. She has also moved an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barmer. The applicant has no option but to live in her parent?s house at Barmer along with her children. Non-applicant has filed a divorce petition against the applicant in the Family Court, Jalore. Applicant has preferred this application seeking transfer of the divorce petition filed by the non-applicant from the Family Court, Jalore to the Court of Additional District Judge No. 1, Barmer on the following grounds :-
2. Applicant is a lady having two minor children. Her parents are aged. Applicant is not only required to discharge her duties at Barmer but has to look after her minor sons and there is no other male member in the family except her father, who can travel with the applicant from Barmer to
4. It is highly inconvenient for the applicant to attend the Court proceedings at Jalore.
Non-applicant ? husband did not choose to file reply to the transfer application.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.
3. From perusal of the record, it reveals that non-applicant has filed the divorce petition against applicant on the ground that his wife treated him and his parents with cruelty. Applicant went to her parent?s house in the year 2013 and did not return back. She along with her sons and ornaments left her in-laws house in December, 2015 and thereafter she lodged an F.I.R. No. 7/2016 with the false allegations against him, in which non-applicant was acquitted by the competent court on 15.02.2020. Non-applicant has no option but to file the divorce petition against applicant-wife as she has deserted him.
4. In the present case, it is not in dispute that two children born out of the wedlock of the parties are presently residing with applicant-wife, who is a lady and living with her parents at Barmer. It has not been shown by the non-applicant that applicant is earning any income. It would be in the interest of both the parties that their matrimonial dispute is settled expeditiously at a suitable place in a healthy atmosphere so that future life of the parties, as also welfare of the minor children, is not adversely affected. In the present case, the place of litigation should not be made an issue by non-applicant because applicant-wife is a lady and having no source of income for maintaining herself and her children. Criminal case and the application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., filed by applicant against non-applicant, are already pending before the Courts at Barmer and the non-applicant has to attend the Court proceedings at Barmer as and when required.
5. In the above backgroun
The court established that the convenience of the parties, especially in cases involving children and allegations of cruelty, is paramount in transfer applications.
The court established that the balance of convenience and the applicant's health concerns are critical in deciding transfer applications under the Code of Civil Procedure.
The court may allow the transfer of a case if the petitioner presents valid and justified grounds, and if the respondent does not rebut the averments made in the transfer application.
The court established that in transfer applications, the convenience of the female litigant is paramount, especially when she has caregiving responsibilities.
The court prioritized the convenience and well-being of the parties, considering the distance between locations and pending legal proceedings, in allowing the transfer of the divorce petition.
In transfer applications, the convenience of the wife is to be preferred over the convenience of the husband, especially when the wife has no source of income and is residing with her parents.
The balance of convenience in transfer applications is determined by the specific circumstances of the parties, particularly considering the welfare of children and financial constraints.
The main legal point established is that in transfer applications, the court must consider the balance of convenience, welfare of the minor, and the parties' convenience in deciding the transfer of m....
The court holds that transfer applications under Section 24 CPC can be granted based on mutual consent, prioritizing the wife's convenience in matrimonial disputes.
The main legal point established is that in transfer applications under Section 24 CPC, the court will consider the balance of convenience and the interest of justice, taking into account the parties....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.