RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Sangeet Lodha, Vinit Kumar Mathur, JJ.
Suo Moto & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Anr. - Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 752/2016 Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13609/2019
Decided On : 29-09-2021
Protection - Lakes - Rajasthan Lakes (Protection and Development) Authority Act, 2015 - The Act establishes a framework for the protection and development of lakes in Rajasthan, mandating state government oversight and authority involvement in conservation efforts.
Fact of the Case:
The court took cognizance of a report highlighting the neglect of temples and water bodies in Jodhpur, leading to the issuance of notices to state authorities for their protection and development.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that despite the establishment of the Rajasthan Lakes (Protection and Development) Authority, there was significant inaction in protecting and developing the lakes, necessitating further directives to the state government and local authorities.
Issues: The main issues included the failure of the state and local authorities to protect and develop lakes as mandated by the Rajasthan Lakes (Protection and Development) Authority Act, 2015.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the state government has a duty to protect lakes and that the authority must actively engage in conservation efforts, as outlined in the Act.
Result: The court directed the state and local authorities to take immediate action for the protection and development of lakes in accordance with the Act.
JUDGMENT
Sangeet Lodha, J. - By an order dated 15.1.16, this Court taking cognizance of a detailed report published in "Rajasthan Patrika", a leading daily newspaper of the State, pointing out deleterious inaction on the part of the State authorities in maintaining and conserving the old temples and the water bodies of Jodhpur City namely, Achalnath Shivalaya, Kunj Bihari Mandir, Arna Jharna, Bhadreshiya Tirth & Vishnu Kund, directed the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to register the news item published as Writ Petition (PIL) and issued notices to the State of Rajasthan, District Collector, Jodhpur and Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur. In response to the notice, the respondents put in appearance before this Court.
2. On 11.2.16, this Court issued directions to the Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur and District Collector, Jodhpur to prepare a complete plan for protection and development of the water bodies as well as the old temples. Directions were issued to clean the areas adjoining to the lakes and temples. Later, vide order dated 20.4.16, the notices were directed to be issued to the Commissioner, Devasthan to explain as to what steps are being taken to protect all the properties of Devasthan in the city of Jodhpur. The progress of maintenance, cleaning and conservation of the lakes and temples was being monitored by this Court by issuing appropriate directions. In the meantime, the issue with regard to the framing of new policy by the Department of Devasthan for protection of Devasthan properties in the State of Rajasthan and in other part of the country, cropped up for consideration of this Court. Pursuant to the directions issued, the Department of Devasthan produced the list of the properties of Devasthan before this Court. The Court expressed its concern to protect and secure the immovable properties of the Devasthan in the State of Rajasthan and throughout the country. The Department of Devasthan, Government of Rajasthan, placed on record Rajasthan Devasthan Rent Policy, 2021, which has come into force w.e.f. 1st April, 2021.
3. Pursuant to order dated 16.4.21 passed by this Court, on 6.8.21, Mr. Bhavit Sharma, Amicus Curiae filed detailed composite affidavit regarding the compliance made and issues raised in the present writ petition. Learned Amicus Curiae submitted the report giving the details regarding the condition of the various lakes/water bodies of the Jodhpur City, namely, Gulab Sagar, Bal Samand Lake, Ummed Sagar, Goverdhan Talab, and drawn attention of this Court to dilapidated condition, lack of cleanliness, contamination and massive destruction of the lakes and other water bodies of Jodhpur City. The Amicus Curias has also drawn the attention of the Court towards the encroachments made on the catchment area of the water bodies. It is pointed out that Bal Samand Lake which is fed by several feeder canals is on the brink of extinction due to illegal mining activities carried out in the vicinity of Bal Samand Lake and feeder canals.
4. The Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur has filed response to the report submitted by the learned Amicus Curiae, wherein it is stated that Gulab Sagar and Fateh Sagar lakes are under the control of the Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur. The steps were taken by the Municipal Corporation time and again for renovation and beautification of the water bodies. The fountains were also installed, but due to continuous throwing of garbages by the locals, the problem still persists. It is pointed out that the State Government has sanctioned Rs. 3 crores for beautification, renovation of Gulab Sagar and Fateh Sagar and pursuant thereto, the Municipal Corporation has already invited Expression of Interest (EoI) for consultancy work for preparing detailed project report for beautification and renovation of Gulab Sagar and Fateh Sagar. It is pointed out that for complete development of Baiji Ka Talab, a detailed project report of 7.22 crores has been prepared. Regarding Ganglao Talab, DPR of 6.02
AI
The Rajasthan Lakes (Protection and Development) Authority Act, 2015 mandates state responsibility for lake conservation, requiring proactive measures from authorities to protect these resources.
The main legal point established is the obligation of the State Government to protect and develop lakes as mandated by the Rajasthan Lakes (Protection and Development) Authority Act, 2015.
The duty to restore and conserve wetlands is a constitutional responsibility, overriding private property disputes, under the East Kolkata Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Act, 2006.
Construction within an established buffer zone around water bodies is illegal; authorities must enforce compliance to protect environmental integrity.
The court mandated the Lake Protection Committee to consider objections regarding the Full Tank Level of Durgam Cheruvu tank, ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice.
Encroachment and pollution of water bodies invoke obligations under environmental protection laws, emphasizing the state's role as trustee for public resources and the need for effective restoration ....
The State must follow due process and cannot arbitrarily demolish legal residential properties without proper notices and adherence to established laws.
The court mandated the fixation of Full Tank Level and protective measures for Ramanthapur Pedda Cheruvu, emphasizing compliance with prior orders and timely action by authorities.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.