SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1840

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Virendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.199/2020, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur, registered for the offences under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through video conferencing as well as learned Public Prosecutor, present- in-person. Perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the third option was given by the Seizure Officer to the accused Rakesh Kumar, Gopal and Virendra. Therefore, it is clear cut the violation of Section 50 of NDPS Act and law laid down by this Court in various cases. The charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time, therefore, benefit of bail may be granted to the accused- petitioner.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that 172.266 Kg. of the contraband (ganja) has been recovered from the possession of accused-petitioner, which is commercial quantity. He lastly, urges that Section 37 of the NDPS Act is clearly attracted in the present case.

Having regard to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top