RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.
Lokesh Jalwania & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 6348/2021 and Civil Writ Petition No. 6388/2021
Decided On : 30-06-2021
QUALIFICATIONS - COVID HEALTH CONSULTANT AND ASSISTANT - The court ruled that the qualifications for the posts of COVID Health Consultant and COVID Health Assistant, as specified in the advertisement, are exclusive and cannot be altered by the court. The court emphasized that the state has the authority to determine qualifications for recruitment, and the petitioners' qualifications (BAMS) do not meet the specified requirements (MBBS and GNM/B.Sc. Nursing). The reliance on a previous interim order was deemed misplaced as it did not consider the qualifications outlined in the advertisement.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought appointment as COVID Health Consultant and COVID Health Assistant, claiming their qualifications (BAMS) should qualify them for the positions advertised by the Department, which required MBBS and GNM/B.Sc. Nursing.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners did not possess the required qualifications as per the advertisement and that the previous interim order did not address the qualifications specified. The court reiterated that it cannot modify the qualifications set by the state.
Issues: Whether the petitioners, holding BAMS degrees, are eligible for the posts of COVID Health Consultant and COVID Health Assistant as per the qualifications specified in the advertisement.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the state has the exclusive authority to prescribe qualifications for recruitment, and judicial review cannot expand or alter these qualifications. The court cannot introduce additional qualifications not specified in the advertisement.
Result: The writ petitions were dismissed as misconceived, and all pending applications were disposed of.
ORDER
1. The petitioners by way of these writ petitions have prayed for appointment on the post of COVID Health Consultant and COVID Health Assistant under the advertisement issued by the Department on 27.05.2021.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have passed Bachelor in Ayurveda (BAMS) and they ought to be considered for the post of COVID Health Consultant and COVID Health Assistant.
3. Learned counsel relies on an order passed by the Principal Seat at Jodhpur in SBCWP No.8028/2021 : Rekha Vaishnav & Ors. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. wherein directions were issued to provisionally allow the petitioners therein to participate in the selection process on the post of COVID Health Assistant and COVID Health Counsultant.
4. This Court finds that the advertisement mentions the qualifications for the post of COVID Health Consultant and COVID Health Assistant as MBBS with RNC registration and GNM/B.Sc. Nursing with RNC Registration respectively. Thus, a person who possesses qualifications of BAMS, that is person who studied in Ayurveda field, is not qualified for appointment either as COVID Health Consultant or as COVID Health Assistant. The interim order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur does not show whether petitioners' counsel informed the Court about the qualifications mentioned in the advertisement. It also does not show as to what qualification the concerned petitioners possessed and therefore, reliance by the learned counsel for the petitioners on the interim order dated 25.06.2021 in Rekha Vaishnav & Ors. (supra) is misconceived.
5. In SBCWP No. 10342/2020: Raghvendra Agarwal & Ors. Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. and connected petitions decided on 01.10.2020 in the case of Community Health Officers, a similar submission was made by the Homeopathic Doctors praying that they should be included for appointment and considered for the post of Community Health Officers, however, after examining all the aspects this Court reached to the conclusion that the court cannot add or subtract educational qualification in an advertisement.
6. In the case of Mukul Kumar Tyagi Vs. State of UP & Ors. reported in (2020) 4 SCC 86 and in Zahoor Ahmad Rather & Ors. Vs. Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad & Ors. reported in (2019) 2 SCC 404 wherein the Supreme Court has held as under:-
7. Thus, it is exclusively within the domain of the State Authority to lay down the educational qualification for a particular post. If the State Government has thought it proper to only include those persons who possess Allopathy qualifications namely MBBS and registration with RNC for the post of COVID Health Consultant and GNM/B.Sc Nursing and registration with RNC for COVID Health Assistant, this Court cannot introduce an additional qualification of Ayurveda namely BAMS for the said purpose. The writ petition is accordingly held to be without basis and is misconceived. The interim order passed at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in SBCWP No.8028/2021 being an ex parte order would have no application.
8. These writ petitions are accordingly dismissed.
9. All pending applications shall stand disposed of.
Mukul Kumar Tyagi Vs. State of UP & Ors. (2020) 4 SCC 86
Zahoor Ahmad Rather & Ors. Vs. Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad & Ors. (2019) 2 SCC 404
The state has the exclusive authority to determine the qualifications for public service positions, and courts cannot modify or expand these qualifications through judicial review.
The judgment establishes that the specified qualifications for a job position are essential for eligibility, and the employer has the prerogative to decide the educational qualification and other con....
Court cannot venture into such exercise. If at all it is required to be done, it can be done by the experts in the field.
Candidates must possess the prescribed qualification for a post at the time of submission of application to be considered eligible.
The court established that the determination of qualifications for public employment is solely within the purview of the state, and judicial review cannot be used to challenge or redefine these quali....
Regulatory bodies' qualifications are essential for appointment eligibility; service rules under Article 309 are legitimate if not violating fundamental rights.
Eligibility criteria for public posts must have rational nexus with duties; arbitrary prescription without justification liable to challenge, relief moulded for fairness.
Eligibility for recruitment is determined as of the application date, and candidates must possess required qualifications by that date.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.