P. B. Bajanthri, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Insofar as, 3rd petitioner – Dr. Shivnath Mahto, the present petition do not survive for consideration in view of the fact that he has died during the pendency of the present petition.

3. In the instant petition, petitioners have prayed for the following relief/reliefs:—

“That this application is directed for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the advertisement no. 4/20 to 9/20 which is in teeth of the apex court Judgement and legal preposition and further issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus/any other appropriate writ/order/direction commanding the respondents to allow the petitioners to participate in permanent requirement process pursuant to advertisement no. 4/20 to 9/20 issued by the respondent no. 4 where in the candidates having equivalent degree to B.A.M.S (Bachelor of Aurvedic Medicine and Surgery) have been deprived from taking part in requirement process which is absolutely against the Principle laid down by the apex court reports in (2007) 12 SCC 728 where in it has been held that Degree of G.A.M.S. (Graduate in Aurvedic Medicine and surgery) is equivalent to B.A.M.S. and in light of