SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1742

CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Gomti Devi Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar Agrawal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ankur Rastogi, Advocate, for the Appellant.

ORDER

1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned ex-parte ad-interim injunction order dated 03.12.2019 passed by the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, No.09, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, in Temporary Injunction Application No.85/2019 titling as Vinod Kumar Vs. Smt Gomti Devi Agarwal, whereby defendants-respondents were directed not to sell the property in favour of the third party and not to alter the actual position of the property, in question.

2. Facts of the present case in nut-shell are that the respondent-plaintiff instituted a suit for partition and declaration. The learned trial Court had passed impugned ex-parte ad-interim injunction order dated 03.12.2019, by which it was directed for all the defendants-respondents, that the property, in question could not be sold out in favour of third party as well as the actual position of the property, in question would not be altered.

3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the impugned order and the material made available on record.

4. The suit is pending before the learned trial Court in which the trial Court passed impugned ex-parte ad-interim injunction o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top