SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1484

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Sajjan Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya, Advocate, for the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the Duty Chart dated 14.10.2021 issued by the respondent- Corporation whereby, the petitioner has been asked to discharge duty as Driver.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after his appointment in the year 2005, he is continuously working as Conductor and now, against his wishes, he cannot be asked to discharge the duty of Driver. He, therefore, prays for quashing the Duty Chart dated 14.10.2021.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

Indisputably, the petitioner applied for appointment in pursuance of advertisement No.201/204-2005 issued by the respondent-Corporation whereby, applications were invited for preparing a Panel for appointment as Driver-cum-Conductor in view of potential requirement of Drivers. The petitioner has been selected and appointed in pursuance thereof. Since, the initial appointment of the petitioner is from the Panel prepared for Driver-cum-Conductor, he cannot raise any grievance if he is required to discharge duty as Driver, though, not required till date. The petitioner has not disputed that he possesses the eligibility for driving a vehicle. It is trite

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top