MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Sajjan Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT
By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the Duty Chart dated 14.10.2021 issued by the respondent- Corporation whereby, the petitioner has been asked to discharge duty as Driver.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after his appointment in the year 2005, he is continuously working as Conductor and now, against his wishes, he cannot be asked to discharge the duty of Driver. He, therefore, prays for quashing the Duty Chart dated 14.10.2021.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
Indisputably, the petitioner applied for appointment in pursuance of advertisement No.201/204-2005 issued by the respondent-Corporation whereby, applications were invited for preparing a Panel for appointment as Driver-cum-Conductor in view of potential requirement of Drivers. The petitioner has been selected and appointed in pursuance thereof. Since, the initial appointment of the petitioner is from the Panel prepared for Driver-cum-Conductor, he cannot raise any grievance if he is required to discharge duty as Driver, though, not required till date. The petitioner has not disputed that he possesses the eligibility for driving a vehicle. It is trite
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.