Bhupendra vs State - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1326

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1326

ARUN BHANSALI, ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Bhupendra – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Pradeep Shah, Advocate, Jitendra Ojha, Advocate, Anil Joshi, Advocate, B.R. Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Both these applications for suspension of sentences filed on behalf of applicant-appellants Bhupendra, Kapil, Pradeep Kumar and Kirandeep are being heard and decided by this common order.

2. The instant applications for suspension of sentences under Section 389 CrPC have been preferred on behalf of the appellant-applicants Bhupendra, Kapil, Pradeep Kumar and Kirandeep, who have been convicted and sentenced for the offences under Sections 302, 201 and 120-B of the IPC vide the judgment dated 20.12.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sagwada, District Dungarpur in Sessions Case No.9/2019. They are convicted and sentenced as below:-

Convicted under Sections
Sentences and/or Fine	In default
302 IPC	Life Imprisonment along with fine of Rs.5,000/- each	Six months' simple imprisonment
201 IPC	3 years' simple imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/- each
120B IPC	Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/- each

3. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

4. As per the prosecution case set out in written report (Ex.P/1) lodged by Ms.Charulata (P.W.1) on 04.02.2019 at the Police Station Sabla, District Dungarpur against s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1326

ARUN BHANSALI, ANOOP KUMAR DHANDBhupendra – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

ARUN BHANSALI, ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Bhupendra – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent