Mahipaal vs State Of Rajasthan - 2022 Supreme(Raj) 2323

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2323

SANDEEP MEHTA, FARJAND ALI
Mahipaal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Deepak Menaria, assisted by Mr. V.K. Gaur & Mr. Mohammed Rasheed, Advocate., for the Petitioner
Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, PP., for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The instant application for suspension of sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by appellant-applicant who has been convicted and sentenced as below vide judgment dated 28.02.2022 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Jaitaran, Pali in Sessions Case No.39/2018:

Offence Under Section	Imprisonment	Fine	Sentence in default of fine
302 IPC	Life imprisonment	Rs.5,000/-	6 Months' SI
460	IPC Life Imprisonment	Rs.5,000/-	6 Months' SI
120 B IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs.5,000/-	6 Months' SI
148 IPC	3 Years' RI	Rs.2,000/-	2 Months' SI
All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor has filed reply to the application for suspension of sentences.

3. By the very same judgment, the trial court convicted the co-accused Hanumanram, Ramnarayan, Smt. Sundari, Mamta and Sushila and sentenced them to life imprisonment as well.

4. The prosecution has come out with a case that the accused Sundari, Mamta and Sushila, wife and daughters respectively of Shri Babulal conspired with the remaining accused persons including the appellant herein to get Shri Babulal murdered. Acting in furtherance of the said conspiracy, certain unknown assailants entered into the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2323

SANDEEP MEHTA, FARJAND ALIMahipaal – AppellantVersusState Of Rajasthan – Respondent

SANDEEP MEHTA, FARJAND ALI
Mahipaal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent