SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2757

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Devaram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S. Rathore, Advocate, S.K. Mehar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.62/2019, Police Station Kalandari, District Sirohi for the offences punishable under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and Sections 67 & 67(A) of the I.T. Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the challan of the case was presented under POCSO Act but in this regard an inquiry was held before the competent Court and the competent Court found that the prosecutrix was a major, therefore, the application filed by the petitioner was accepted. Counsel further submits that according to the statement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., she mentions her age as 19 years. FIR in this case has been lodged after a considerable delay and no explanation has been given for the said delay. Challan of the case has already been presented and no investigation is pending against the petitioner. The petitioner is in the judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top