SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1368

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
National Insurance Co. Ltd, Suratgarh Through Deputy Manager – Appellant
Versus
Mamta – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shubhankar Johari, Advocate, R.C. Joshi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant ? Insurance Company against the judgment and award dated 11.11.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hanumangarh in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 309/2009, whereby, an amount of Rs. 7,38,000/- was awarded as compensation to the respondent/claimants on account of the death of Shri Tekchand in the accident which occurred on 14.06.2009.

2. The learned Tribunal, after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence on record and hearing learned counsel for the parties decided the claim petition of the claimant ? respondent.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant ? Insurance Company vehemently argued that the findings of the Tribunal recorded on Issue No. 1 is erroneous. The vehicle insured with the appellant ? Insurance Company was falsely implicated in the present case just to get the compensation. He further submits that a bare perusal of the Site Plan (Exp. 3) prepared by the police during the course of investigation, shows that the Jeep was being driven by its driver on the correct side and there was no question that he was driving the jeep negligently and caused the accident. He submits th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top