Back
ARUN BHANSALI
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Chandrakala – Respondent
ORDER
1. This appeal is directed against judgment and award dated 20.12.2019 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bikaner ('the Tribunal'), whereby, the Tribunal has awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.9,74,176/- alongwith interest @ 7% p.a. from the date of application i.e. 01/02/2016.
2. The application for compensation was filed by the claimants inter-alia with the submissions that on 01.11.2015 at about 8:00PM, Yogesh was riding on motorcycle, he was followed by a vehicle being occupied by Umesh Kumar Swami & Balveer, near Dholamaru Bus Station, a jeep/pickup No. RJ-13-GA-3261, which was being driven rashly and negligently came from the wrong side and struck the motorcycle resulting in Yogesh suffering grievous injuries, to which he later succumbed.
3. Based on the said aspect and on account of untimely death of Yogesh compensation was sought.
4. A response was filed by Owner of the vehicle denying any negligence and indicating that if any case of liability is found, the same is that of the Insurance Company.
5. The Driver remained ex-parte and the Insurance Company in its reply, claimed that the Driver of the vehicle was not in possession of a valid and effective driving li
The court established that the determination of vehicle involvement in accidents relies on the preponderance of probabilities, and the burden of proof lies with the party denying involvement.
The court established that evidence of negligence and vehicle involvement can be supported by witness testimony, despite initial FIR discrepancies.
In motor vehicle accident claims, proof is required on a preponderance of probabilities rather than beyond reasonable doubt; the insurance company's failure to provide witness testimony undermined it....
The burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish the involvement of the vehicle in the accident; the Tribunal's award of compensation is upheld as just and reasonable.
The court established that witness testimony can substantiate claims of negligence in motor vehicle accidents, affirming the liability of the driver and the insurance company.
The court affirmed that corroborative evidence and the totality of circumstances are crucial in establishing liability in motor vehicle accident claims.
The testimony of an eyewitness can be credible even if not cited in the Chargesheet, and sufficient evidence can establish the involvement and negligence of the offending vehicle.
Liability of the insurance company in motor accident cases is determined based on the evidence of the circumstances of the accident and the conduct of the insured driver.
The burden of proof for contributory negligence, the duty of drivers at intersections, and the rule of res-ipsa loquitor as a rule of evidence in motor accident cases.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
