SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2093

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Imam Bax – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Bajrang Singh, Advocate, Anil Bidan, Advocate, Arun Kuma, Advocate, S.K.Punia, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A (2) Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.100/2021, Police Station Chhattargarh, Distt. Bikaner for the offences under Sections 376, 306, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(v), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act, against the order dated 19.08.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) and Additional Sessions Judge, Bikaner in Criminal Misc. Bail Application (CIS) No.1515/2021 whereby, the bail application preferred on behalf of the appellant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was rejected.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant has not committed the offences as alleged against him and he is innocent. No offence under Section 376 IPC is made out against him. The prosecutrix committed suicide and there is no allegation of abetement as well. The learned court below has grossly erred in law and facts as well as in declining to release the appellant on bail.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the prayer of bail m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top