SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2267

ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Alisher Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Pankaj Kumar Gupta, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate, B.R. Chahar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anoop Kumar Dhand, J. - This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is laid by petitioner in connection with FIR No.112/2021, registered at Police Station Jaswantgarh, District Nagaur wherein he is charged for offences punishable under Sections 450 & 376(2)(n) IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that age of prosecutrix is 21 years and as per the statements of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. date of the alleged incident is 12.04.2021. Thereafter, the prosecutrix kept mum for a long time and then she further alleged that again the same incident was repeated with her on 02.08.2021 and FIR had been lodged after ten days, i.e., on 12.08.2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that it may be a case of consent of false implication. He further submits that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time. Lastly, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents so indulgence of bail may be given to him.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the part

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top