RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J.
Omprakash - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15690 of 2021
Decided On : 01-12-2021
BAIL - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - The court granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. considering the age of the prosecutrix, the time elapsed since the alleged incident, and the completion of the investigation, emphasizing the need for a fair trial without pre-judging the merits of the case.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought bail in connection with FIR No.96/2021 for offences under Sections 450 & 376 IPC, with the prosecutrix being 40 years old and the incident alleged to have occurred four years prior.
Finding of the Court:
The court found it appropriate to grant bail, noting the elapsed time since the incident and the completion of the investigation, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the nature of the charges and the circumstances surrounding the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of not pre-judging the merits of the case while also considering the age of the prosecutrix and the time elapsed since the alleged incident.
Result: The bail application was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and sureties.
JUDGMENT
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J. - This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is laid by petitioner in connection with FIR No.96/2021, registered at Police Station Kurabad, District Udaipur, wherein he is charged for offences punishable under Sections 450 & 376 IPC.
2. It is contended on behalf of petitioner that age of prosecutrix is 40 years age and as per her statements recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., date of the alleged incident is of four years back. It is further contended that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has already been filed and trial will take its own time.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and looking to the allegations levelled and the statements recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence to the petitioner by enlarging him on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Omprakash @ Kalu S/o Motiram, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.96/2021, Police Station Kurabad, District Udaipur, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the circumstances warrant it, particularly considering the time elapsed and the completion of the investigation.
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the majority of charges are bailable and the case is at a stage where a charge-sheet has been submitted.
The court established that in bail applications, factors such as the delay in filing the FIR, the nature of the allegations, and the accused's criminal history are critical in determining the appropr....
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the accused has been in custody for a significant period and the offence is triable by a Magistrate, reflecting the court....
The court considered the age of the petitioner and the circumstances of the case in granting bail.
The court may grant bail considering factors such as the petitioner's age, duration of custody, and the status of co-accused.
The court established that inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's allegations and the absence of a criminal record for the accused are critical factors in determining bail eligibility.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the nature of the offences, the duration of custody, and the overall facts and circumstances of the case.
The court considered the inordinate delay in filing the FIR, lack of corroboration of rape allegations with medical evidence, and the likelihood of a lengthy trial in granting bail to the accused.
The court considered the delay in FIR lodging, lack of corroboration with medical evidence, and the age of the prosecutrix in granting bail to the accused-petitioner.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.