SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2282

SUDESH BANSAL
Hemlata Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Sanbhav Sharma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vijay Raj Bhargav, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sudesh Bansal, J. - This transfer petition has been filed by the petitioner-wife for seeking transfer of divorce petition filed by the respondent- husband from Family Court, Pali to Family Court, Jaipur.

2. From the perusal of record it appears that before filing this divorce petition respondent-husband also filed one application No.200/2019 under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act and against this application petitioner filed one writ petition wherein the further proceedings of application under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act have been stayed.

3. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to place the relevant documents of writ petition before this Court.

4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that at present the petitioner-wife is residing at Jaipur and having two years old baby, therefore, it is highly inconvenient for her to contest the divorce petition at Pali and as such the petitioner-wife has filed the present application for seeking transfer of the divorce petition to the Family Court, Jaipur.

5. Heard.

6. Issue notice to the respondent, returnable within eight weeks.

7. Notices be filed in two sets. One set of notice be sent through registered post and another by way of ordina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top