SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2292

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Ugma Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rohitash Singh, Advocate, A.R.Choudhary, Advocate, Dr.Ajeet Singh Shekhawat, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner have been arrested in connection with FIR No.193/2021, Police Station Khunkhuna, Distt. Nagaur for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 325, 307/34 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the complainant submits that there are cross-cases and the compromise has been arrived in between the parties. The petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioners on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners (1) Ugma Ram S/o Shankar Ram and (2) Mukesh Meghwal @ Moola Ram S/o Shankar Ram shall be enlarged on bail in FI

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top