SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1455

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Kamlesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shambhoo Singh, Advocate, Mahipal Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.74/2021, Police Station Gingala, Distt. Udaipur for the offence under Section 302/34 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that eye-witnesses Ganga Meena and Praksh have specifically made allegation against co-accused Dinesh. The accused-petitioner Kamlesh and Smt. Jamna Devi gave only fist-blows. It is further stated that co-accused Jamna Devi has already been granted bail by this Court and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of the co-accused. Moreover, challan of the case has already been presented The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5 .Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top