SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1082

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Mangi Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Raghuraj Sharma, Advocate, Shrawan Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.292/2021 of Police Station Kapasan, District Chittorgarh, for the offence punishable under Section 392/34 of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that offence is triable by Magistrate and similarly situated co-accused Shankarlal has already been enlarged on bail by this Court and the case of present petitioner is similar. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since 17.03.2022 and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Mangi Lal S/o Shri Hajari Lal Loda, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.292/2021 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top