SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5508

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, MANOJ JAIN
Asstt Comdt Durga Nandan Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Advocate, for the Respondent.
Mr. Satya Ranjan Swain, SPC for UOI with Mr. Kautilya Birat, GP, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral) - Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the year 2019, no representation has been made before the respondents. He submits that the present writ petition may be disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the present writ petition as a fresh representation and to decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

2. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the present writ petition as a representation and to dispose of the same within a period of eight weeks from today. It is clarified that this Court has neither considered nor commented on the merits of the case of either party.

3. Needless to state that petitioner would be at liberty to avail of appropriate remedies in accordance with law, if aggrieved by a decision on the representation.

4. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top