Back
2023 Supreme(Raj) 862
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Dinesh Mehta, J.
Minakshi & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18967 of 2022
Decided On : 19-01-2023
Important Points
Subject
Civil Law - Writ Petition
Headnote
Preponement - Writ Petition - The court allowed the application seeking preponement of date and directed the respondent to decide the representation expeditiously.
Fact of the Case:
The court allowed the application seeking preponement of date and directed the respondent to decide the representation expeditiously.
Finding of the Court:
The court found in favor of the petitioners and directed the respondent to decide the representation expeditiously.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the need for expeditious redressal of the petitioners' grievance.
Final Decision: The court directed the petitioners to file a representation within a specified period and directed the respondent to consider and decide the representation in accordance with the law.
O.P. Sangwa, Advocate
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Mehta, J. - I.A. No.1/2023:
1. For the reasons stated, the application seeking preponement of date is allowed.
2. The matter is taken up for consideration today itself.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondent to decide his representation expeditiously.
4. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file a representation along with the web copy of the order dated 14.03.2019 rendered in the case of Ashok Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15411/2018) and in the case of Dhanraj Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12846/2017), decided on 15.01.2018 within a period of two weeks along with certified copy of the order instant.
5. In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the competent authority of respondent shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law as early as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks.
6. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners’ grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.
7. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
