SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2171

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Ajay @ Raja Ram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.A. Siddiqui, Advocate, Mahipal Vishnoi, Advocate, R.S. Choudhary, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.189/2021, Police Station Ladnun, District Nagaur for the offence punishable under Section 376(2) of Indian Penal Code and Section 5/6 POCSO Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that F.I.R. in this case has been lodged after considerable delay and this delay has not been explained by the prosecutrix. Learned counsel further submits that there are material contradictions in the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 161 & 164 Cr.P.C. Challan of the case has already been presented. In these circumstances, the petitioner may be released on bail.

3. Per contra, Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and carefully gone through the material available on record.

5. There are specific allegation against the petitioner. No case for grant of bail is made out.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file bail appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top