RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
Uma Shanker Vyas, J.
Rajesh Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension of Sentence Application No. 330 of 2021 In Criminal Revision Petition No. 1250 of 2021
Decided On : 20-11-2021
SUSPENSION - SENTENCE - The court allowed the suspension of the applicant's sentence during the pendency of the criminal revision petition, emphasizing the applicant's prior bail status and the potential delay in hearing the case. The court required a personal bond and sureties to ensure the applicant's appearance in future proceedings.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was convicted for multiple offenses under IPC and the M.V. Act, receiving various sentences including imprisonment and fines. After the appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, the applicant sought suspension of his sentence while a criminal revision petition was pending.
Finding of the Court:
The court found merit in the applicant's request for suspension of sentence, considering his previous bail status and the anticipated delay in the hearing of the revision petition. The court allowed the suspension on the condition of providing a personal bond and sureties.
Issues: Whether the applicant's sentence should be suspended during the pendency of the criminal revision petition.
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the suspension of sentence is warranted when the applicant has been on bail during trial and appeal, and when there is a likelihood of delay in the judicial process.
Result: The court allowed the suspension of the applicant's sentence, contingent upon the provision of a personal bond and sureties.
JUDGMENT
Uma Shanker Vyas, J. - This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the applicant seeking suspension of his sentence.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant was convicted by the Trial Court vide its judgment dated 31.08.2018 for the offence under Section(s) 279, 337 & 304A IPC and for the offence under Section(s) 134/187 of M.V. Act and sentenced as under:-
3. For offence under Section 279 IPC- Simple Imprisonment of six months with a fine of Rs.1,000/-; in default of payment of fine, to further undergo Simple Imprisonment of one month.
4. For offence under Section 337 IPC- Simple Imprisonment of six months with a fine of Rs.500/-; in default of payment of fine, to further undergo Simple Imprisonment of ten days.
5. For offence under Section 304A IPC- Simple Imprisonment of two years with a fine of Rs.10,000/-; in default of payment of fine, to further undergo Simple Imprisonment of two months.
6. For offence under Section(s) 134/187 M.V. Act- A fine of Rs.500/-; in default of payment of fine, to further undergo Simple Imprisonment of five days.
7. The appellant-applicant thereafter filed an appeal, but the appellate Court vide its judgment dated 10.11.2021 dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment passed by the Trial Court.
8. Learned counsel further submits that the accused applicant was on bail during trial as well as during appeal and at present is behind bars in district Jail, Sawai Madhopur. The hearing of the criminal revision petition may take long time thus, the sentence awarded to the applicant may be suspended during the pendency of the petition.
9. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed same.
10. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and carefully scanned the entire material available on record, this suspension of sentence application filed by the applicant is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to accused applicant Rajesh Kumar S/o Shri Shankar Lal by the Trial Court and affirmed by the Appellate Court shall remain suspended during the pendency of the petition, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each before the concerned Trial Court to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 20th December, 2021 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.
The court established that a suspension of sentence may be granted when the applicant demonstrates prior compliance with bail conditions and the potential for prolonged judicial proceedings.
The court established that the suspension of sentence can be granted based on the applicant's circumstances, including prior bail and the potential delay in the judicial process.
The court has the discretion to suspend substantive sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C. based on the arguments and facts of the case.
The court established that a convicted individual may have their sentence suspended if they were previously on bail and the trial process is prolonged.
The court has the discretion to suspend a sentence if circumstances justify, such as the duration of custody and potential delays in the appeal process.
The court may suspend a sentence if the accused are on bail and the appeal process is expected to take a significant amount of time.
The court has the discretion to suspend the sentence under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. based on the totality of facts and circumstances of the case.
The court established that suspension of sentences can be granted based on the duration served and the circumstances surrounding each case.
The court has the discretion to suspend a sentence based on the facts and circumstances of the case, including the length of the applicant's custody and the likelihood of considerable time for the di....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.