Back
SANDEEP MEHTA
Vidhya Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER
1. The instant revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 CrPC has been preferred by the petitioner Vidhya Devi for assailing the judgment dated 12.09.2019 passed by the learned Addtional Sessions Judge, Raisinghnagar rejecting the victim's appeal preferred by the petitioner under Section 372 CrPC and affirming the judgment dated 15.09.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Raisinghnagar in Criminal Regular Case No.81/2001 acquitting the respondents from the offences punishable under Sections 467, 471 and 120-B IPC.
2. I have heard and considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor and have gone through the impugned judgments.
3. At the outset, it may be stated here that two courts of competent jurisdiction have, after thorough appreciation and re-appreciation of the evidence available on record, recorded concurrent findings of facts for acquitting the respondents from the above offences and for upholding their acquittal. The substratum of the allegations as set out by the petitioner in her FIR was that the respondents accused fabricated the documents and got executed the sale deed of the land, of wh
An acquittal by lower courts can only be overturned if there is a demonstrable failure of justice, and concurrent findings of fact must be respected unless proven otherwise.
The execution of a forged sale deed constitutes conspiracy and forgery under IPC, supported by forensic evidence confirming the identity of the imposter.
Point of Law – Fraud and cheating – Acquittal justified - no inducement was given to the complainant by respondent No.1 to deliver any property as the disputed property was already in possession of r....
The revisional jurisdiction of the High Court is extremely narrow and can only be exercised in exceptional cases where there is a manifest error of law or procedure, and the High Court cannot convert....
The High Court's revisional jurisdiction does not permit converting an acquittal into a conviction unless evident legal errors or miscarriage of justice are demonstrated.
The High Court's revisional jurisdiction is limited; it cannot convert an acquittal into a conviction without manifest illegality or miscarriage of justice.
Execution of sale deeds exceeding a co-sharer’s share does not constitute forgery or cheating, reaffirming that civil disputes should not be criminalized without clear offences being present.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
