SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3138

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
K. S. Ramasami – Appellant
Versus
K. Rajendran (Died) – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:M. Guruprasad, Advocate. For the Respondents:Valliappan, Senior Advocate, T. Deeraj, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer in C.R.P.No.1565 of 2020:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC, to set aside the order dated 19.11.2019 made in E.P. No. 26 of 2018 in O.S. No. 638 of 2000 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Palladam.

In C.R.P.No.1566 of 2020:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC, to set aside the order dated 12.11.2019 made in E.A.No.41 of 2019 in E.P.No.26 of 2018 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Palladam.)

Common Order:

1. The Plaintiff in O.S. No. 638 of 2000 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur, is the Revision Petitioner in these Civil Revision Petitions. Aggrieved by the order dated 19.11.2019 made in E.P. No. 26 of 2018 in O.S. No. 638 of 2000 as well as the order dated 12.11.2019 made in E.A. No. 41 of 2019 in E.P. No. 26 of 2018, both on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Palladam, had preferred these Civil Revision Petitions.

2. The Plaintiff has instituted the suit in O.S. No. 638 of 2000 for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,53,783/- being the principal and interest due on two promisory notes dated 10.11.1997 and 09.12.1997 executed by the sole Defendant by name Rajendran in his favour for Rs.55,000/- a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top