SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1537

FARJAND ALI
Ladha Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. R.J. Punia, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Mohd. Javed Gauri, PP, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. By way of filing the instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. a challenge was made to the judgment dated 05.02.2014 passed by learned Additional District and Session Judge, Bhinmal, District Jalore (for short, 'learned appellate court') in Criminal Appeal No.22/2013 which was partly allowed and was filed against the judgment dated 28.05.2013 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Sanchor, District Jalore (for short, 'learned trial court') in Criminal Original Case No.224/2000 whereby the petitioner was acquitted from the offence under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act and Section 3 of Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984.

2. The brief facts of the case are that a criminal prosecution was launched against the petitioner for accusation of committing an offence under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act and Section 3 of Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984. After a rigorous trial and waiting for long 13 years, vide judgment dated 28.05.2013, the learned trial court did not found the case proved against the petitioner and thus, he was acquitted from the charges by giving benefit of doubt. The said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top