Saroj Agarwal vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 1627

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1627

ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Saroj Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. C.P. Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:

'It is, therefore, humbly prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the writ petition and by appropriate writ order or direction the order dated 23.06.2015 so far it is relates to denial of pay and allowances from the date of suspension i.e. 04.09.2006 to the date of termination i.e. 28.12.2007 despite treating it to be the period spend on duty and the period from 28.12.2007 to 08.05.2015 by treating it to be non working may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents be directed to grant all consequential benefits to the petitioner from 04.09.2006 to 08.05.2015 including pay and allowances for the said period.

Or any other appropriate relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.'

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was working on the post of Lower Divisional Clerk (LDC). Counsel submits that the petitioner was arrested in a Criminal Case lodged against her for the offence under Section 302 and 120B IPC. On the basis of her arrest, she was placed under suspension on 04.09.2006 and she remained

Click Here to Read the rest of this document