Back
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, KULDEEP MATHUR
State of Rajasthan, Through the Secretary, Department of Medical and Health – Appellant
Versus
Sunita, D/o. Shri Roop Chand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Kuldeep Mathur, J.
1. The controversy following the recruitment drive initiated by the appellant-State came to be decided by learned Single Judge on different dates. Since common question of law and fact is involved in the present batch of special appeals, these are being heard together and decided by this common order and judgment. The following posts were advertised through different advertisements / corrigendum:-
'Women Health Worker' vide advertisement no. uflZax@eåLokådk;Zå@,We,WuvkÃVh@¼lh/kh HkrhZ & 2018½@2018@1363 dated 18.06.2018 for the Non-TSP area wherein 4965 posts were advertised for Non-TSP area.
2. For convenience, the facts from the lead case being D.B. Civil Special Appeal Writ No.241/2021 (State of Rajasthan and Ors.
The court established that additional minor disabilities should not disqualify candidates with 40% or more disability in one leg from public employment, reinforcing the principles of equality and non....
The court ruled that candidates with disabilities must not be discriminated against based on their degree of disability, ensuring equal treatment in public employment.
The Act mandates that only individuals with permanent disabilities meet the benchmark for reservation in employment, excluding those with temporary disabilities from eligibility.
Point of Law : when an advertisement mentions a particular qualification and an appointment is made in disregard of the same, it is not a matter only between the appointing authority and the appointe....
Candidates must meet all eligibility criteria, including medical standards outlined in the recruitment notification, to qualify for appointment.
The court established that valid certifications under the RPwD Act must be recognized for admission to medical courses, emphasizing the authority of designated certifying bodies over assessments by o....
The assessment of disabilities under statutory guidelines by competent authorities must be prioritized over any subsequent assessments made by non-statutory boards for admission to medical courses.
The court held that a competent authority's disability assessment cannot be altered by another board, and reliance on incomplete medical reports for disqualification is arbitrary.
The court determined that candidates with disabilities must not be discriminated against based on arbitrary restrictions in employment advertisements, affirming the right to equal opportunity under t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
