IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K. PATTANAIK, J.
Sameer Satapathy - Petitioner
Versus
State of Odisha And Others - Opposite Parties
W.P.(C) No.19594, 19246, 19578, 19635 of 2021
Decided On : 25-09-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the petitions regarding disability certification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court's analysis on applicability of disability laws and implications for petitioners. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. arguments concerning temporary versus permanent disability in context of job reservations. (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 18) |
| 4. definition of benchmark disability for job reservation. (Para 15) |
| 5. conclusion and order based on court findings and directions. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT:
R.K. PATTANAIK, J.
1. All the writ petitions have been clubbed together for disposal by the following common judgment.
2. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioners assailing the impugned notification dated 28th June, 2021 at Annexure-14 and further to direct opposite party No.1 to issue letters of appointment in their favour to the posts applied for pursuant to the select list as at Annexure-5 with effect from the date the other candidates have been issued the appointment orders besides granting them the consequential service and financial benefits within a stipulated period.
3. In fact, the challenge is to the notification of the Government of Odisha in Department of Water Resources at Annexure-14, whereby, the petitioners have been found not suitable to be appointed to the posts under Persons with Disabilities (PwDs) category after verification by the Special Medical Board in terms of the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and guidelines issued by the Social Security and Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (SS&EPD) Department dated 24th October, 2019 as wholly illegal, arbitrary and not in consonance with law and guidelines of the Department dated 16th April, 2019 by then in force when Advertisement No.1 of 2019/20 was published by the Odisha Public Service Commission (OPSC) dated 27th May, 2019 and equally violative of the principles of natural justice.
4. The OPSC with the advertisement as per Annexure-1 invited online applications from the prospective candidates to fill up the posts of Assistant Executive Engineer (Civil) in (a) Water Resources Department; (b) Works Department; and (c) Housing and Urban Development Department under Water Resources Department and Assistant Executive Engineer (Mechanical) under Water Resources Department in Group-A of the Odisha Engineering Service carrying the scale of pay in Level-12 of Pay Matrix under Odisha Revised Scales of Pay Rules, 2017 with usual DA and other allowances as may be admissible. In the said advertisement, the vacancy position for PwDs category was 37 with the following break-ups, such as, (i) blindness/low vision-16; (ii) hearing impairment-05;(iii) locomotor disability/cerebral palsy-04; and (iv) autism/intellectual disabilities/multiple disabilities-12.
5. According to the petitioners, in such advertisement i.e. Annexure-1, nature and degree of disability has not been prescribed for being eligible. The requirement of a Disability Certificate is only specified therein indicating the percentage of specified disability. It is pleaded that as per the advertisement, persons with more than 40% disability are bestowed with a concession for being exempted from payment of fee on the application with age relaxation. Pursuant to the advertisement of the OPSC, the petitioners with all documents applied for the posts enclosing Disability Certificates (Annexure-2) issued by the District Medical Board. The common pleading is that the OPSC having found the petitioners eligible, issued admit cards (Annexure-3) to them as PwDs candidates to appear the written examination to be held on 15th December, 2019. The petitioners, as further made to reveal from the pleading on record, having cleared the written examination were called for viva voce test by letters of intimation (Annexure-4) fixing the dates to appear for the said purpose. Thereafter, according to the petitioners, all of them stood provi
Vikash Kumar Vrs. Union Public Service Commission and others
The Act mandates that only individuals with permanent disabilities meet the benchmark for reservation in employment, excluding those with temporary disabilities from eligibility.
Valid benchmark disability certificate with validity period entitles reservation under RPwD Act in direct recruitment, regardless of 'temporary' label; executive instructions cannot override statute ....
Only individuals with permanent disabilities qualify for reservation benefits, while temporary disabilities do not meet the legal benchmarks set by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act.
Temporary disability certificates do not qualify individuals for employment benefits reserved for persons with benchmark disabilities under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
The court established that additional minor disabilities should not disqualify candidates with 40% or more disability in one leg from public employment, reinforcing the principles of equality and non....
Eligibility for appointment in reserved categories depends on the specific nature of disability as defined by law, not merely on the candidate's performance.
The court affirmed the importance of valid disability certificates and the necessity of adhering to established benchmarks for disability in employment decisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.