IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
GANESH RAM MEENA, J.
Rajkumar S/o Kanhaiya Lal – Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 223 of 2024
Decided On : 09-09-2024
Bail - Narcotic Drugs - Section 8/15, 25, 35, 37, 54 of NDPS Act - The court emphasized the presumption of possession and culpable mental state under the NDPS Act, leading to the denial of bail due to the serious nature of the charges and the quantity of contraband involved.
Fact of the Case:
The accused filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an offence under the NDPS Act, claiming false implication and lack of evidence against him, while the prosecution argued the seriousness of the charges and the recovery of a large quantity of contraband from his vehicle.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the accused had personal knowledge of the contraband in his vehicle, establishing conscious possession, and noted the serious implications of the NDPS Act provisions regarding bail.
Issues: Whether the accused is entitled to bail considering the nature of the charges and the quantity of contraband recovered.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that possession of contraband creates a presumption of guilt under the NDPS Act, and the accused failed to disprove conscious possession, justifying the denial of bail.
Result: The bail application is dismissed.
ORDER :
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 0179/2023 registered at Police Station Sawar District Kekari for the offence punishable under Section 8/15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘the Act of 1985’) and after investigation charge-sheet was submitted for the offence punishable under section 8/25 of the Act of 1985.
2. Facts of the case in nutshell are that on 10.09.2023 complainant Mr. Manvendra Singh Chauhan, CI/SHO, Police Station Sawar lodged an FIR, which is quoted as under:
^^vkt fnukad 10-09-2023 dks le; 12%05 ih,e ij eu Fkkukf/kdkjh ekuosUæflag iqfu dks Fkkuk gktk ij lwpuk feyh dh ,d vYVks dkj okys us 'kkgiqjk xsV ds ikl xk; ds VDdj ekj nh vkSj dkj NksM+dj ekSds ls Hkkx x;k vkfn bryk ij eu Fkkukf/kdkjh ekuosUæflag iqfu e; tkIrk gSMdkfu 1469 ca'khyky] dkfu 1024 rstey] dkfu 2455 jes'kpUæ e; ÁkbZosV okgu e; vuqla/kku ckWDl e; ysiVki fÁUVj ds Fkkuk ls jokuk gksdj eqrkfcd bryk ds 'kkgiqjk xsV igqpk] tgka 'kkgiqjk xsV ds vUnj dh rjQ dkQh HkhM+ ,df=r gks j[kh Fkh rFkk fo|qr VªkUlQkeZj ds ikl ,d lQsn jax vYVks dkj uacj vkjts 06 lhlh 5458 [kM+h Fkh] dkj ds vkxs cEij dh tkyh o ihNs dk dkap gYdk VwVk gqvk gS] dkj ds vUnj pkch yxh gqbZ gS] rFkk dkj cUn iM+h gS] ekSds ij [kM+s yksxksa ls iwNk rks crk;k fd lquh xk; ;gk ij [kM+h Fkh] ftlds vYVks dkj ls VDdj yxrs yxrs cph gS] xk; ;gka ls pyh xbZ] xk; ds dksbZ pksV ugha vk;h] ysfdu dkj pkyd Mjdj viuh dkj dks ;gh ij NksM+dj 'kkgiqjk xsV ds ckgj dh rjQ Hkkx x;k] ftl ij eu Fkkukf/kdkjh ekuosUæflag }kjk HkhM+ dks ekSds ls gVus ckcr funsZf'kr dj ekSds ij b/kj m/kj vYVks dkj ds pkyd dh ryk'k dh x;h] ysfdu ugha feykA ftl ij vYVks dkj dh f[kM+dh [kksydj pSd fd;k rks vYVks dkj dh ihNs dh lhV ij IykLVhd ds nks dkys jax ds dVVs o ihNs fMDdh esa IykLVhd ds nks dkys jax ds dVVs Hkjs iM+s feys ftudks lqa?kus o ns[kus o voS/k eknd inkFkZ MksMk iksLr gksus dh iw.kZ laHkkouk gSA ,Mhih,l ,DV ds fof/kuqlkj dk;Zokgh djus gsrq okgu dh pSfdax o djus gsrq nks Lora= xokg ryc djus okLrs le; 12%30 ih,e ij gqDeukek ewfrZc dj dkfu 1024 rstey dks nsdj xokgh rych ckcr voxr djk;kA ftl ij dkfu rstey us FkksM+h nsj ckj vkdj crk;k fd dksbZ O;fDr dksVZ dpgjh ds pDdj o rLdjks ds Hk; ls dk;Zokgh esa xokg cuus dks rS;kj ugha gqvkA ftl ij gejkgh tkCrk esa ls dkfu 2455 jes'kpUæ o dkfu 1024 rstey dks ekSds ij dk;Zokgh gsrq xokg cuus ckcr QnZ lgefr xokg eqrhZc dj voxr djk;k] ftl ij dkfu rstey o dkfu jes'kpUæ us LosPNk ls xokg cus ckcr fyf[kr lgefr Ánku dhA rRi'pkr eu Fkkukf/kdkjh ekuosUæflag iqfu }kjk tkIrk dh enn ls okgu vYVks uacj vkjts 06 lhlh 5458 es ihNs dh lhV ij iM+s dkys jax ds nks IykLVhd ds dVVs dks tkIrk dh enn ls vYVks dkj ls mrkjdj pSd fd;k x;k rks IykLVhd ds pkjksa dVVks ds eqag dks lqryh ls lhyk gqvk gS] dVVks dk jax dkyk gS] pkjks dVVks dks [kksydj pSd fd;k x;k rks leLr IykLVhd ds dVVks es MksMk iksLr Hkjk feyk] tks eu Fkkukf/kdkjh o tkIrk }kjk lqa?kus o p[kus ij iwokZuqHko ds vk/kkj ij voS/k eknd inkFkZ MksMk iksLr gksuk ik;k x;kA ftl vYVks dkj uacj vkjts 06 lhlh 5458 ds vKkr pkyd }kjk voS/k eknd inkFkZ MksMk iksLr dCts esa j[kus o okgu esa ifjogu djuk vijk/k /kkjk 8@15 ,uMhi,l ,DV ds odq esa vkuk ik;k tkus ij mijksä pkjks dVVks dks dCts iqfyl ysdj eu Fkkukf/kdkjh }kjk gejkgh tkIrk o xokg dh mifLFkrh esa vuqla/kku ckWDl esa j[ks bysDVªksfud dkaVs dh enn ls ÁR;sd dVVs dk otu fd;k x;k rks dkys jax ds ÁFke IykLVhd ds dVVs dk otu djus ij MksMk iksLr lghr dqy otu 20 fdyksxzke gksuk ik;k x;k] ftl ij IykLVhd ds dVVs dks f'kYMeksgj fpV psik dj ekdkZ , vafdr fd;k x;kA dkys jax ds nwljs IykLVhd ds dVs dk otu djus ij MksMk iksLr lghr dqy otu 20 fdyksxzke gksuk ik;k x;k] ftl ij IykLVhd ds dVVs dks f'kYMeksgj fpV psik dj ekdkZ ch vafdr fd;k x;kA dkys jax ds rhljs IykLVhd ds dVs dk otu djus ij MksMk iksLr lfgr dqy otu 19 fdyksxzke gksuk ik;k x;k] ftl ij IykLVhd ds dVVs dks f'kYMeksgj fpV psIkk dj ekdkZ lh vafdr fd;k x;kA dkys jax ds pkSFks IykLVhd ds dVVs dk otu djus ij MksMk iksLr lghr dqy otu 19 fdyksxzk
Possession of narcotics creates a presumption of guilt under the NDPS Act, and the accused must prove lack of conscious possession to be granted bail.
Ownership of a vehicle creates a presumption of knowledge regarding its use for illegal activities under the NDPS Act, impacting bail eligibility.
The court emphasized that in narcotics cases involving commercial quantities, a presumption of conscious possession applies to all occupants of a vehicle, requiring strict adherence to Section 37 of ....
The duty of the Investigating Officer to establish the owner's knowledge or consent for the vehicle to be used in the commission of the offence under Section 25 of the NDPS Act, and the limitations o....
Point of law: Rejection of bail application - it is for the accused to satisfy the court that there are reasonable grounds to believe that accused is not guilty of the offence alleged against him and....
The presumption of conscious possession applies in drug cases, necessitating the petitioner to disprove involvement in the crime to grant bail under the NDPS Act.
Bail can be granted based on the period of custody, arguable points on merits, and satisfaction of the rigors of Section 37(1)(b) of the NDPS Act in similar cases.
Point of law: That there has been a judicious application of mind by the judge who is deciding an application under Section 439 of the CrPC must emerge from the quality of the reasoning which is embo....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.