SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 117

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
Arnav Saviraj Chauhan - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr. MP(M) No. 293 of 2026
Decided On : 30-03-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General

The presumption of conscious possession applies in drug cases, necessitating the petitioner to disprove involvement in the crime to grant bail under the NDPS Act.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20, 25, 29, and 37 - Grant of bail - The petitioner sought bail in FIR 204 of 2025 for possession of contraband - The Court highlighted the nature of evidence and the need for establishing conscious possession under the NDPS Act - The quantity of recovered charas, being 1 kg 174 grams, was classified as commercial, invoking stricter bail conditions - It was determined the presumption of possession applies under Sections 34 and 54; the burden was on the petitioner to rebut this presumption - The denial of bail was justified considering the severity of the charge and evidence presented. (Paras 11, 12, 14 and 16)

(B) Bail - Principles for granting - Courts must not grant bail mechanically, and adherence to principles laid down by the Supreme Court regarding the substantive grounds for bail is imperative - The petitioner’s status as a law student and lack of criminal antecedents were weighed against the evidence of involvement in serious drug offenses. (Paras 8-11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR No. 204 of 2025 after 1 kg 174 grams of charas was recovered from a vehicle he occupied. He asserted innocence, claiming no direct connection to the drugs and sought bail.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner’s request for bail was dismissed on the grounds of serious allegations, presumption of possession, and the nature of recovered contraband.

Issues: The primary questions included the applicability of presumption under the NDPS Act and the adequacy of evidence for establishing bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that conscious possession must be proven; mere presence in a vehicle with contraband is insufficient to establish innocence, and the commercial quantity of drugs necessitates strict bail considerations.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. details of the bail petition and the accusations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. opposition to the bail petition by the police. (Para 3)
3. court hears arguments from both parties. (Para 4)
4. defence arguments regarding innocence and evidence inadmissibility. (Para 5 , 6)
5. legal standards and parameters for granting bail. (Para 8 , 10 , 11)
6. judicial consideration of possession and evidence. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
7. legislative standards for bail related to commercial quantities. (Para 15)
8. limits on the use of confessions made by co-accused. (Para 16)
9. conclusion of the court regarding the bail petition. (Para 19 , 20)
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.

The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking regular bail in FIR No. 204 of 2025 , dated 22.09. , registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 20, 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the NDPS Act’) at Police Station Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P.

2. It has been asserted that the petitioner is a law student aged 20 years. He is a permanent resident of Shimla, having roots in the society. The petitioner was arrested in F.I.R. No. 204 of 2025 and was unable to appear in his examination because of his incarceration. The petitioner was arrayed as an accused because of his presence in the vehicle from which 1 kg 174 grams of charas was recovered. Co-accused Kashin Kashyap, Ayansh and Srivastav were the financiers of the purchase. Kashin Kashyap transferred Rs. 50,000/- through Google Pay, and Ayansh transferred Rs. 14,200/-through UPI to Rewat Ram, who was subsequently arrested on 04.11. . The police have also filed the charge sheet. The petitioner has remained in prison for more than five months. No recovery is to be effected from the petitioner. Money transactions do not connect the petitioner to any of the co-accused. The mobile phone of Kashin Kashyap was also found in the laptop bag, which connects him to the commission of the crime. As per the prosecution’s case, the petitioner had not visited Kullu, H.P. He was not seen in CCTV footage and had not purchased the charas. He was the only occupant of the vehicle and was not connected to the charas. The co-accused Kashin Kashyap has been released on bail, and the petitioner is entitled to bail on the principle of parity. Hence, it was prayed that the present petition be allowed and the petitioner be released on bail.

3. The petition is opposed by filing a status report asserting that the police had set up a nakka at Pungh four-lane and were checking the vehicles on 22.09. 2025 . They intercepted a vehicle bearing registration No. UP-16AX-2143. The driver and occupants of the vehicle got frightened after seeing the police. The police associated Kuldeep Kumar and Mukesh Kumar as independent witnesses. The police inquired about the names of the occupants of the vehicle. The driver identified himself as Devayas Patel, the person sitting beside him identified himself as Nakul Mittal, and the persons sitting in the rear seat identified themselves as Arnav Chauhan (present petitioner), Saksham Bharti and Rohit Kumar. The police searched the vehicle and recovered a carry bag containing 1.174 kilograms of charas. The police seized the charas and arrested the occupants of the vehicle. The charas was sent to SFSL, Junga, and as per the report of analysis, it was confirmed to be a sample of charas. The occupants revealed during interrogation that they had handed over Rs. 5000/-each to Kashin Kashyap, who had also accompanied the accused on his motorcycle. They identified the room where they had stayed in Kullu. The petitioner had gone to Kullu from Solan to purchase Charas on 21.09. , but had stayed in a hotel at 9 miles Pandoh, with his friends Nakul Mittal, Rohit Kumar and Aditya Kumar. Divyansh Patel, Nakul Mittal, petitioner, Saksham Bharti and Rohit Kumar revealed during the investigation that they handed over Rs. 5000/- each to Kashin














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top