MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Manohari – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL, J.:— This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 31.10.1987 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dausa, District Jaipur (for brevity “the learned trial Court”) in Sessions Case No. 32/1984 : State of Rajasthan v. Manohari, whereby, the accused-appellant (for brevity, “the appellant”) has been convicted and sentenced as under:—
2. The relevant facts in brief are that a written report dated 13.04.1984 (Exhibit-P-2) came to be lodged by complainant Shri Phoolchand (PW-2) with the Police Station Manpur, District Jaipur alleging therein that the appellant has inflicted a lathi blow on the head of his mother resulting into her death whereupon, an FIR no. 59/1984 under Sec. 302 IPC was registered against him.
3. After investigation, the police filed charge-sheet under Section 302 IPC against him. After committal, the learned trial Court framed charge against the appellant under the aforesaid provision. The appellant pleaded not guilty and demanded trial. The learned trial C
Alister Anthony Pareira v. State of Maharashtra
The court may reduce a sentence to the period already undergone considering the lengthy pendency of the case and the age of the appellant.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion in applying sentencing principles based on the facts and circumstances of each case, as well as the influence of preceden....
The court emphasized the consideration of the gravity of the crime, motive for the crime, and all other attendant circumstances in determining the appropriate sentence.
The court upheld the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC but reduced the sentence to the time already served, considering the lengthy trial and circumstances of the case.
The court upheld the conviction under Section 304 Part I IPC while modifying the sentence to the time already served due to mitigating circumstances.
The court clarified that intent to kill is essential for murder charges, finding that lack of specific intent warranted a conviction under culpable homicide instead.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.