IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Anil Kumar Upman, J.
Shivji Ram @ Shivji – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6264 of 2023
Decided On : 02-06-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application filed under ndps act. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's observations on applicability of ndps provisions. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments on bail eligibility. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. court's opinion on bail grant. (Para 6) |
| 5. order for release on bail with conditions. (Para 7) |
ORDER :
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.PC. On behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 0025/2023, Police Station Mangaliyawas, District Ajmer, for the offence under Section 8 /18 for the NDPS Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per Note No. 3 appended below the Schedule of the NDPS Act, cultivation of poppy straw would be punishable under Section 18 (C) of the NDPS Act and thus, the restriction contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot operate against the petitioner. He contends that the petitioner has no previous criminal antecedents. He submits that investigation is complete and charge-sheet has been filed and the trial of the case is likely to consume time. He thus prays that the petitioner deserves to be released on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advances by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. Having considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, it is evident that the offence of cultivating opium poppy would be covered by Section 18 (C) of the NDPS Act in view of the Note No. 3 appended below the Schedule of the NDPS Act. Therefore, the restriction contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act would not be applicable in such a case. The petitioner is in custody. Investigation is complete and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case is likely to consume time.
6. In this background and having regard to the overall facts and circumstances available on record, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner deserves to be released on bail.
7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Shivji Ram alias Shivji S/o. Late Shri. Tejaram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 0025/2023, Police Station Mangaliyawas, District Ajmer shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 80,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 40,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The court determined that the restrictions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act do not apply when the offence does not involve commercial quantity or severe sections, allowing bail.
The court considered the lengthy trial process and absence of other pending cases in granting bail to the accused-petitioner for the offense under the NDPS act.
The court granted bail under the NDPS Act, finding no commercial quantity prescribed for cultivation and no risk of tampering with evidence.
The absence of specified small and commercial quantities for opium poppy cultivation under the NDPS Act means Section 37 does not apply, allowing for bail.
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. even in cases involving serious allegations under the NDPS Act, provided the circumstances warrant such a decision.
The court ruled that restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act do not apply when no defined quantity for commercial classification exists, allowing bail.
The stringent bail conditions under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, are not applicable to cases involving the illicit cultivation of poppy plants, as the legis....
In cases involving the illegal cultivation of poppy plants under narcotics legislation, the restrictive bail provisions are not attracted. Courts may grant bail upon considering factors such as the c....
The court ruled that the absence of specified commercial quantity for poppy cultivation under the NDPS Act, combined with lack of evidence tampering risk, justifies granting bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.