IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J.
Victim - Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6282 of 2024
Decided On : 26-04-2024
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 363, 376 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act - Termination of pregnancy sought by a minor rape victim - Court emphasized the paramount importance of the minor's welfare and safety in granting permission for termination. (Paras 8-10)
(B) Medical Board's opinion - The continuation of pregnancy would negatively impact the minor's physical and mental well-being, and the risk of termination is not higher than that of full-term delivery. (Paras 6-9)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a minor rape victim, sought permission for termination of her 25 weeks and 3 days pregnancy, following a sexual assault. The Medical Board opined on the risks involved in continuing the pregnancy.
Findings of Court:
The court granted permission for the termination of pregnancy, prioritizing the minor's health and well-being.
Issues: The main issues included the impact of carrying the pregnancy to term on the minor's health and the legality of terminating the pregnancy beyond the 24-week limit.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the welfare of the minor is paramount, and the risks associated with termination do not outweigh the risks of carrying the pregnancy to term.
Result: Writ petition stands disposed of with directions for immediate termination of pregnancy.
JUDGMENT :
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J.
The petitioner is a minor victim of rape who was subjected to sexual assault due to which she became pregnant. The First Information Report bearing No. 151/2-24 has been registered against the accused with Police Station Anantpura, Kota for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 376 of IPC and Sections 5(I)/6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking permission from this Court for termination of her pregnancy, which is alleged to be of 25 weeks and 3 days.
3. To ascertain the aforesaid aspect of the matter, this Court on 25.4.2024 after hearing the Counsel for the parties and looking to the urgency in the matter, passed an order for constitution of a Medical Board for examination of the health condition of the petitioner with regard to her pregnancy.
4. In compliance of the aforesaid order, the victim was produced by the SHO, Police Station Anantpura, Kota before the Superintendent, J.K. Lon Hospital, Kota who constituted a Medical Board for examination of health condition of the victim with regard to her pregnancy.
5. Thereafter, the Medical Board gave its opinion indicating therein that the petitioner is carrying 25 weeks and 3 days pregnancy but no opinion with regard to health condition of the petitioner was given, hence under these circumstances, this Court vide order dated 25.4.2024 directed the Medical Board to give specific opinion with regard to the two following questions:-
(II) "Whether termination of the pregnancy can be carried out at this stage and the same would not be any threat to the life of the minor?"
6. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, the Medical Board again re-examined the petitioner and submitted the following opinion on 25.4.2024 which reads as under:-
The termination of pregnancy at this gestation would be a threat to the life of the minor."
7. Recently, the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of A (Mother of X) v. State of Maharashtra & Anr., while deciding the Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 9163/2024, decided on 2.4.2024 has allowed the pregnancy of the minor rape victim carrying pregnancy of 26 weeks.
8. After taken into consideration, the health condition of the said victim who was 14 years of age, following order was passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in paras 10 and 11 which reads as under:-
(i) The medical termination of pregnancy is sought in respect of a minor who is 14 years old:
(ii) The pregnancy is alleged to be an emanation form a sexual assault which was resulted in the registration of a First Information Report. The FIR was recorded on 20.3.2024 beyond the period of 24 weeks envisaged in the MTP Act;
(iii) The minor was unaware of the fact that she was pregnant until a very late stage;
(iv) The Medical Board at Sion Hospital has clearly opined that the continuation of the pregnancy against the will of the minor "may impact negatively on physical and mental well being of the minor who is barely 14 years old"; and
(v) While a certain degree of risk is involved in every procedure for medical termination, the Medical Board has opined that the threat to life of the patient if termination of pregnancy is carried out at this stage is not higher than the risk of delivery at full term of pregnancy.
11. We will further elaborate on the guiding parameters in a reasoned order which will be delivered separately. However, bearing in mind the exigencies of the situation, the welfare of the minor, which is of paramount importance and her safety, we pass the following order:
(i) The judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 4.4.2024 shall stand set aside for reasons to follow;
(ii) The Dean at Sion Hospital is requested
The court prioritized the welfare of a minor rape victim in granting permission for pregnancy termination, emphasizing health risks and legal considerations.
The court allowed the termination of a minor's pregnancy resulting from rape, prioritizing her mental health and well-being over the continuation of the pregnancy.
The mental health of a minor rape victim is a critical factor in decisions regarding pregnancy termination, necessitating judicial consideration.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, in the context of a minor victim of rape seeking terminati....
Point of law : Victim of Rape – Termination of pregnancy - since each day's delay would be crucial for the victim and the family, Court direct the Superintendent of Medical College to terminate the p....
The court affirmed that medical termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks is not permissible unless specific medical criteria are met, emphasizing the need to balance the reproductive rights of the gu....
The right to terminate a pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act is upheld as fundamental to the autonomy and dignity of a minor rape victim, despite gestational limits.
(1) Certain degree of risk is involved in every procedure for medical termination.(2) In view of urgency of situation, Supreme Court can exercise its powers under Article 142 of Constitution.
The court ruled that a minor victim of rape may have her pregnancy terminated under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, if it poses a grave risk to her mental health.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.