SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1831

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J.
Pushpendra Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 10956 of 2022, S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 10657 of 2022
Decided On : 12-01-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S.S. Solanki, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Chandra Gupt Chopra, PP.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - Petitions filed for quashing an FIR concerning allegations under Sections 204, 379, 420, 506, and 120-B of IPC - Court found no basis to quash as allegations are subject to investigation - Direction to file representation with documentary evidence before Investigating Officer - Notice to be issued under Section 41-A if a cognizable offence is established. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Inherent jurisdiction - The court emphasized that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 should not intervene when allegations warrant further investigation and cannot be dismissed outright. (Para 2)

Table of Content
1. quashing of fir under cr.p.c. 482 not permissible. (Para 1)
2. court observes allegations are subject to investigation. (Para 2)
3. procedural directions for investigation and disposal of petitions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)

ORDER :

Anoop Kumar Dhand, J.

Instant petitions have been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of F.I.R. No. 10/2022 registered at Police Station Sodala, Jaipur City South for the offences under Sections 204 , 379, 420, 506 and 120-B of IPC.

2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the allegations made in the aforesaid F.I.R. are the subject matter of investigation and the same cannot be quashed in the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

3. The petitioners may file a representation before the Investigating Officer with all documentary evidence, who shall consider the same in accordance with law.

4. In case, the Investigating Officer comes to the conclusion that cognizable offence is made out against the petitioners, he shall issue a notice to the petitioners as required under Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C.

5. Instant criminal miscellaneous petitions as well as the stay applications stand disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top