Abdul Hameed vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 1874

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1874

CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Abdul Hameed – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Hari Krishana Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. M.K. Sheoran, Public Prosecutor, Mr. D.K. Dixit, Advocate for complainant.

Table of Content
1. quashing of fir under section 482 crpc. (Para 1 , 2)
2. opposition to fir quashing. (Para 3 , 4)
3. judicial guidelines on section 482 powers. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. investigation permitted based on fir allegations. (Para 9)
5. petition dismissed; fir stands. (Para 10)

ORDER :

Chandra Kumar Songara, J.

Instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred on behalf of the accused-petitioner with the prayer for quashing of F.I.R. No.629/2019 dt.01.11.2019 registered at Police Station Gangapur City District Sawai Madhopur for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406, 323 & 504 of INDIAN PENAL CODE .

2. Submissions of learned counsel appearing for the accused-petitioner are that the petitioner has instituted a suit for restitution of conjugal rights before the learned Civil Court, Gangapur City and after issuing notice therein, the complainant-respondent No.2 lodged the present F.I.R. with the mala-fide intention against the petitioner & his family members. The petitioner has also filed a complaint before the Court of A.C.J.M., Gangapur City against the complainant-respondent No.2 & her family members for offences punishable und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document