Back
BIRENDRA KUMAR
Shyoram – Appellant
Versus
Madanlal – Respondent
ORDER :
Mr. Birendra Kumar, J. - The factual background of this case, leading to filing of this Civil Revision Petition under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is that respondent Madanlal and Gopal Lal sons of Jhutha filed Civil Suit No.06/2016 for declaration of title on the suit property and cancellation of registered sale deed dated 16.06.1988 executed by the guardian of minor plaintiffs in favour of Late Shri Nathu. The challenge was on the ground that the impugned sale deed speaks that for benefit of the minors, the property was sold. However during the same period on 03.06.1987 and 16.06.1988, property was purchased by the family through registered sale deeds, which goes to show that family was not running under financial crunches. Moreover, the plaintiffs were informed by their father that in fact he had not executed the sale deed.
2. The defendant-petitioners appeared in the suit and filed an application under Order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C. for rejection of the plaint. The provisions of Order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C. reads as follows:-
(a) where it does not disclose a cause of action;
(b) where the relie
The court ruled that issues of limitation and validity of a sale deed require evidence and cannot be resolved at the plaint rejection stage.
A suit challenging a sale deed must be filed within the limitation period; failure to do so results in the suit being barred.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that for deciding an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC, the relevant facts to be looked into are the averments in the plaint, and the pleas ....
A plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 if it is barred by limitation or fails to disclose a cause of action, emphasizing the necessity for clear and truthful averments.
The court ruled that a suit filed after a lengthy delay is barred by limitation, establishing that the commencement of limitation can start from an earlier event, not just the filing date.
A suit challenging a sale deed filed after the limitation period is barred and must be dismissed, emphasizing the necessity of disclosing a valid cause of action and proper valuation.
A plaintiff must clearly state the cause of action and relevant details in the plaint for it to be maintainable; lack of such specifics can lead to the rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11....
The main legal point established is that while exercising power under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, the court must ensure that the plaint discloses a cause of action and the suit is not barred by any law. A....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
