SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2339

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Sant Lal Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. R.M. Bairwa, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Yadav with Ms. Kanta Devi.

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - This civil second appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 01.11.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No.10, Jaipur Metropolitan (for brevity, "the learned Appellate Court") in Civil Regular Appeal No.71/2017 whereby, while dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellants-defendants (for brevity, "the defendants"), the judgment dated 23.02.2017 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan (for brevity, "the learned trial Court") partly decreeing the suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff (for brevity, "the plaintiff") for declaration, has been affirmed.

2. The relevant facts in brief are that the plaintiff filed a suit for declaration against the defendants stating therein that he was appointed as permanent Conductor by the defendant-Corporation in the year 1977 and vide order dated 05.07.1998, he was granted regular pay scale. It was averred that his services were terminated vide order dated 28.07.1982, which was set aside by the learned Court in a civil suit filed by him and ultimately, this Court, vide its judgment and decree dated 17.09.2002 passed in civil second appeal, directe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top