Back
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Haryana Dairy Development Co-Operative Federation Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Raghbir Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of pay scale dispute (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. court's reasoning on entitlement to benefits (Para 9 , 13 , 16 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 25) |
| 3. arguments on maintainability of suit (Para 14 , 15 , 17 , 19 , 23) |
| 4. final conclusion on appeals and orders (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
By this common order, two Regular Second Appeals, the details of which have been given in the heading of the order, are being disposed of as both the appeals involve the same question of law on similar facts.
CM-107-C-2023 in RSA-31-2023
2. As prayed for, the application is allowed.
3. Present Regular Second Appeal has been filed against the order of the lower Appellate Court dated 02.09.2022 by which, the judgment of the trial Court has been set aside and the suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff has been allowed so as to grant him the benefit of first higher standard pay scale w.e.f. 16.11.1995 and second ACP scale w.e.f. 16.11.2005 with the consequential relief of pay and retiral benefits including the gratuity, leave encashment, pension etc., along with arrears of pay with interest @ 9% per annum.
4.
Financial upgradation under service rules is strictly anchored to the pay scale of the entry-level post. Furthermore, courts must dismiss civil suits that are filed beyond the statutory limitation pe....
Authorities have discretion to correct financial discrepancies in pay, yet wrongful promotions may negate claims for additional benefits like A.C.P. confirmations.
ACP financial upgradation follows existing post hierarchy on eligibility date; retrospective recruitment rules cannot deny vested rights without justification, ensuring parity with similarly placed e....
Review petition dismissed due to inordinate delay and laches; no ACPS benefits for Group A posts with feeder grades.
An employee is entitled to a second higher pay-scale after 15 years of service if they remain stagnated in the same pay-scale despite receiving promotions.
Similarly situated employees entitled to notional pay fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and actual benefits from 21.04.2004 under 5th CPC upgradation; prior judgments in rem mandate parity despite delay in ....
Retired employees entitled to second ACP in Rs.8000-13500 w.e.f. date of SSS cadre restructuring (12.02.2002) upon completing 24 years service, as non-functional scales ignored and benefits granted i....
Similarly situated employees entitled to uniform notional pay fixation from 01.01.1996 under 5th CPC anomaly rectification, with actual benefits from 21.04.2004; prior judgments in rem mandate parity....
Inspectors and Superintendents entitled to notional pay scale upgradation from 01.01.1996 under 5th CPC on parity; actual benefits from 21.04.2004; prior judgments in rem bind department for uniform ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
